[#90865] [Ruby trunk Bug#15499] Breaking behavior on ruby 2.6: rb_thread_call_without_gvl doesn't invoke unblock_function when used on the main thread — apolcyn@...
Issue #15499 has been reported by apolcyn (alex polcyn).
3 messages
2019/01/03
[#90877] [Ruby trunk Bug#15499] Breaking behavior on ruby 2.6: rb_thread_call_without_gvl doesn't invoke unblock_function when used on the main thread — apolcyn@...
Issue #15499 has been updated by apolcyn (alex polcyn).
3 messages
2019/01/03
[#90895] Re: [ruby-alerts:11680] failure alert on trunk-mjit@silicon-docker (NG (r66707)) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
ko1c-failure@atdot.net wrote:
4 messages
2019/01/05
[#90896] Re: [ruby-alerts:11680] failure alert on trunk-mjit@silicon-docker (NG (r66707))
— Takashi Kokubun <takashikkbn@...>
2019/01/05
Thanks to explain that.
[#91200] [Ruby trunk Feature#15553] Addrinfo.getaddrinfo supports timeout — glass.saga@...
Issue #15553 has been reported by Glass_saga (Masaki Matsushita).
4 messages
2019/01/21
[#91289] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#15553] Addrinfo.getaddrinfo supports timeout
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2019/01/26
glass.saga@gmail.com wrote:
[ruby-core:91312] [Ruby trunk Feature#11076] Enumerable method count_by
From:
keystonelemur@...
Date:
2019-01-29 01:05:01 UTC
List:
ruby-core #91312
Issue #11076 has been updated by baweaver (Brandon Weaver).
mame (Yusuke Endoh) wrote:
> I have learnt the word "tally" in this thread. Thank you. It looks good to me, a non-native speaker. I have put this on the agenda of the next developers' meeting.
>
> By the way, what is the precise semantics of the method?
>
> Question 1. What identity is the object in the keys?
>
> ```
> str1 = "a"
> str2 = "a"
> t = [str1, str2].tally
>
> p t #=> { "a" => 2 }
>
> p t.keys.first.object_id #=> str1.object_id or str2.object_id ?
> ```
>
> IMO: I think it should prefer the first element, so it should be equal to `str1.object_id`.
>
> Question 2. What is the key of `tally_by`?
>
> ```
> str1 = "a"
> str2 = "A"
> t = [str1, str2].tally_by(&:upcase)
>
> p t #=> { "a" => 2 } or { "A" => 2 } ?
>
> p t.keys.first.object_id #=> str1.object_id, str2.object_id, or otherwise?
> ```
>
> IMO: The return values of `sort_by` and `max_by` contains the original elements, not the return value of the block. According to the analogy to them, I think that `t` should be `{ "a" => 2 }` and its key be `str1.object_id`.
Answer 1: I would say the first, but `tally` could also be effectively represented by `tally_by(&:itself)` as shown in an implementation below:
Answer 2: The transformed value, like `group_by`:
```
[1, 2, 3].group_by(&:even?)
=> {false=>[1, 3], true=>[2]}
[1, 2, 3].tally_by(&:even?)
=> {false => 2, true => 1}
```
The implementation is similar to this:
```
module Enumerable
# Implementing via group_by
def tally_by(&fn)
group_by(&fn).to_h { |k, vs| [k, vs.size] }
end
# Implementing via reduction
def tally_by2(&fn)
each_with_object(Hash.new(0)) { |v, a| a[fn[v]] += 1 }
end
end
```
...which would result in the first `object_id` I believe.
----------------------------------------
Feature #11076: Enumerable method count_by
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11076#change-76559
* Author: haraldb (Harald B旦ttiger)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
I very often use `Hash[array.group_by{|x|x}.map{|x,y|[x,y.size]}]`.
Would be nice with to have a method called `count_by`:
~~~ruby
array = ['aa', 'aA', 'bb', 'cc']
p array.count_by(&:downcase) #=> {'aa'=>2,'bb'=>1,'cc'=>1}
~~~
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>