[#90865] [Ruby trunk Bug#15499] Breaking behavior on ruby 2.6: rb_thread_call_without_gvl doesn't invoke unblock_function when used on the main thread — apolcyn@...
Issue #15499 has been reported by apolcyn (alex polcyn).
3 messages
2019/01/03
[#90877] [Ruby trunk Bug#15499] Breaking behavior on ruby 2.6: rb_thread_call_without_gvl doesn't invoke unblock_function when used on the main thread — apolcyn@...
Issue #15499 has been updated by apolcyn (alex polcyn).
3 messages
2019/01/03
[#90895] Re: [ruby-alerts:11680] failure alert on trunk-mjit@silicon-docker (NG (r66707)) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
ko1c-failure@atdot.net wrote:
4 messages
2019/01/05
[#90896] Re: [ruby-alerts:11680] failure alert on trunk-mjit@silicon-docker (NG (r66707))
— Takashi Kokubun <takashikkbn@...>
2019/01/05
Thanks to explain that.
[#91200] [Ruby trunk Feature#15553] Addrinfo.getaddrinfo supports timeout — glass.saga@...
Issue #15553 has been reported by Glass_saga (Masaki Matsushita).
4 messages
2019/01/21
[#91289] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#15553] Addrinfo.getaddrinfo supports timeout
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2019/01/26
glass.saga@gmail.com wrote:
[ruby-core:91000] [Ruby trunk Bug#14890] test/ruby/test_time_tz.rb - Skip on Windows (mswin|mingw)?
From:
nagachika00@...
Date:
2019-01-10 14:46:48 UTC
List:
ruby-core #91000
Issue #14890 has been updated by nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga). Backport changed from 2.3: DONTNEED, 2.4: DONTNEED, 2.5: REQUIRED to 2.3: DONTNEED, 2.4: DONTNEED, 2.5: DONE ruby_2_5 r66780 merged revision(s) 63823,63839. ---------------------------------------- Bug #14890: test/ruby/test_time_tz.rb - Skip on Windows (mswin|mingw)? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14890#change-76221 * Author: MSP-Greg (Greg L) * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.6.0dev (2018-07-02 trunk 63823) [x64-mingw32] * Backport: 2.3: DONTNEED, 2.4: DONTNEED, 2.5: DONE ---------------------------------------- Should the test file test/ruby/test_time_tz.rb be skipped on Windows? ruby-loco has some additional reporting features, and until r63823, none of the asserts were actually running (see with_tz definition). Since no asserts are run, including the tests in the 'tests' count is misleading. I'd do a PR, but wasn't sure whether to use a top-level return or a conditional after the class end statement. Greg -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>