[#88925] [Ruby trunk Feature#15095] [PATCH] share VM stack between threads and fibers if identical — ko1@...
Issue #15095 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
4 messages
2018/09/09
[#88927] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#15095] [PATCH] share VM stack between threads and fibers if identical
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/09/09
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
[#88926] [Ruby trunk Feature#15095] [PATCH] share VM stack between threads and fibers if identical — ko1@...
Issue #15095 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
3 messages
2018/09/09
[#89218] [Ruby trunk Bug#15130] open-uri hangs on cygwin — duerst@...
Issue #15130 has been updated by duerst (Martin D端rst).
5 messages
2018/09/30
[ruby-core:89109] Re: Fwd: [ruby-cvs:71879] nobu:r64787 (trunk): Add union method to Array
From:
Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
Date:
2018-09-20 13:03:08 UTC
List:
ruby-core #89109
FWIW, it looks correct on GitHub: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/ce079f165176d168ced2c81c79c9d1f889ab173a On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Martin J. D端rst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: > Any chance to get messages such as the one below to include non-ASCII > characters correctly? > > Ana's name isn't Ana Mar?\195?\173a Mart?\195?\173nez G?\195?\179mez, > it's Ana Mar鱈a Mart鱈nez G坦mez. Email can handle this, and so should the rest > of our infrastructure. Please tell me if you need any help. > > Regards, Martin. > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: [ruby-cvs:71879] nobu:r64787 (trunk): Add union method to Array > Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 12:18:52 +0900 > From: nobu@ruby-lang.org > To: ruby-cvs@ruby-lang.org > > nobu 2018-09-20 12:18:52 +0900 (Thu, 20 Sep 2018) > > New Revision: 64787 > > https://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=revision&revision=64787 > > Log: > Add union method to Array > I introduce a `union` method equivalent to the `|` operator, but > which > accept more than array as argument. This improved readability, and it > is also coherent with the `+` operator, which has a similar `concat` > method. The method doesn't modify the original object and return a new > object instead. It is plan to introduce a `union!` method as well. > Tests and documentation are included. > It solves partially https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14097 > [Fix GH-1747] [Feature #14097] > From: Ana Mar?\195?\173a Mart?\195?\173nez G?\195?\179mez > <ammartinez@suse.de> > > Modified files: > trunk/NEWS > trunk/array.c > trunk/test/ruby/test_array.rb > . > > > Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> > <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core> Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>