[#85940] [Ruby trunk Bug#14578] Forking a child process inside of a mutex crashes the ruby interpreter — ben.govero@...
Issue #14578 has been reported by bengovero (Ben Govero).
3 messages
2018/03/05
[#86205] [Ruby trunk Feature#14618] Add display width method to String for CLI — aycabta@...
Issue #14618 has been reported by aycabta (aycabta .).
3 messages
2018/03/19
[#86366] Re: [ruby-cvs:70102] usa:r63008 (trunk): get rid of test error/failure on Windows introduced at r62955 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
usa@ruby-lang.org wrote:
3 messages
2018/03/28
[ruby-core:86222] [Ruby trunk Bug#14231] __uint128_t check in hash.c is broken, use
From:
nagachika00@...
Date:
2018-03-20 13:52:12 UTC
List:
ruby-core #86222
Issue #14231 has been updated by nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga). Backport changed from 2.3: REQUIRED, 2.4: REQUIRED, 2.5: DONE to 2.3: REQUIRED, 2.4: DONE, 2.5: DONE ruby_2_4 r62863 merged revision(s) 61471,61472. ---------------------------------------- Bug #14231: __uint128_t check in hash.c is broken, use https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14231#change-71116 * Author: bircoph (Andrew Savchenko) * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: * ruby -v: * Backport: 2.3: REQUIRED, 2.4: DONE, 2.5: DONE ---------------------------------------- Current check for __uint128_t in hash.c is not valid, since it ignores compilers other than gcc. We hit this on lcc on e2k platform. Configure script properly checks from 128-bit data types support and sets HAVE_UINT128_T accordingly. This approach is already used within ruby at bignum.c, random.c, etc. Probably hash.c is an overlooked remnant of old days. This patch fixes this. See also GitHub PR on this issue: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/1781 ---Files-------------------------------- ruby-uint128-check.patch (413 Bytes) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>