[#85940] [Ruby trunk Bug#14578] Forking a child process inside of a mutex crashes the ruby interpreter — ben.govero@...
Issue #14578 has been reported by bengovero (Ben Govero).
3 messages
2018/03/05
[#86205] [Ruby trunk Feature#14618] Add display width method to String for CLI — aycabta@...
Issue #14618 has been reported by aycabta (aycabta .).
3 messages
2018/03/19
[#86366] Re: [ruby-cvs:70102] usa:r63008 (trunk): get rid of test error/failure on Windows introduced at r62955 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
usa@ruby-lang.org wrote:
3 messages
2018/03/28
[ruby-core:86007] [Ruby trunk Bug#14588] math library functions should NOT raise exceptions
From:
spamscud2003@...
Date:
2018-03-08 05:58:07 UTC
List:
ruby-core #86007
Issue #14588 has been updated by Anon92929 (Anon Ymous). Maybe the issue is too many asserts and not enough warnings. Maybe these stray NaN cases should be warnings instead of asserts. Maybe puts/print should know how to print integers. ---------------------------------------- Bug #14588: math library functions should NOT raise exceptions https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14588#change-70869 * Author: Anon92929 (Anon Ymous) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: * ruby -v: * Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN, 2.5: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- BigDecimal, Integer, Float, none of these should raise exceptions, but they should all fail SILENTLY or return NaN during error cases. I shouldn't have to go fix every possible way that BigDecimal might throw a breaking change in a thousand places in my codebase. I need math libraries that DON'T BREAK!!! BUG RESUBMITTED. The bug was rejected at github because I was referred to open a ticket at ruby-lang.org. The bug was rejectet at ruby-lang.org because the ticket was closed at github. Not cool, guys. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>