[#81492] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — normalperson@...
Issue #13618 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
12 messages
2017/06/01
[#88695] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/08/27
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13618
[#81569] [Ruby trunk Feature#12589] VM performance improvement proposal — vmakarov@...
Issue #12589 has been updated by vmakarov (Vladimir Makarov).
3 messages
2017/06/04
[#81581] [Ruby trunk Bug#13632] Not processable interrupt queue for a thread after it's notified that FD is closed in some other thread. — sir.nickolas@...
Issue #13632 has been reported by nvashchenko (Nikolay Vashchenko).
4 messages
2017/06/05
[#81590] Re: [ruby-cvs:66197] ko1:r59023 (trunk): revert r59020 because it may fail some tests sometimes on some environment (http://ci.rvm.jp/). This revert is to check the reason of failures. — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
ko1@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2017/06/06
[#81591] Re: [ruby-cvs:66197] ko1:r59023 (trunk): revert r59020 because it may fail some tests sometimes on some environment (http://ci.rvm.jp/). This revert is to check the reason of failures.
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/06/06
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#81596] Re: [ruby-cvs:66203] Re: Re: ko1:r59023 (trunk): revert r59020 because it may fail some tests sometimes on some environment (http://ci.rvm.jp/). This revert is to check the reason of failures.
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/06/06
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#81825] [Ruby trunk Feature#13697] [PATCH]: futex based thread primitives — normalperson@...
Issue #13697 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
3 messages
2017/06/29
[ruby-core:81554] [Ruby trunk Bug#13623] meta-programming, adding sub-module fails with syntax error
From:
adriaan1@...
Date:
2017-06-03 06:43:48 UTC
List:
ruby-core #81554
Issue #13623 has been updated by caschip (Aad Schippers).
So you are saying this is how it should work and not a bug? If that is true, I should close this. What do you mean when you say that Object::const_get('Foo')::Bar is syntactically a constant. Its contains characters that are not appropriate in constant names, like brackets and single quotes, and a method is called, const_get, to evaluate it. To me it is an expression a::b::c with two scope operators, two constants (Object and Bar) and one method call that returns a constant const_get('Foo') => Foo.
----------------------------------------
Bug #13623: meta-programming, adding sub-module fails with syntax error
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13623#change-65257
* Author: caschip (Aad Schippers)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.4.0p0 (2016-12-24 revision 57164) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.2: UNKNOWN, 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
The goal is to add a sub-module to a higher level module. The higher level module is derived from its name in a string. This works in one case and gives an unexpected syntax error in another case.
failing_meta:4: syntax error, unexpected '\n', expecting &. or :: or '[' or '.'
failing_meta:8: syntax error, unexpected keyword_end, expecting end-of-input
---Files--------------------------------
no_meta (72 Bytes)
working_meta (82 Bytes)
failing_meta (95 Bytes)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>