[#81492] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — normalperson@...
Issue #13618 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
12 messages
2017/06/01
[#88695] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/08/27
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13618
[#81569] [Ruby trunk Feature#12589] VM performance improvement proposal — vmakarov@...
Issue #12589 has been updated by vmakarov (Vladimir Makarov).
3 messages
2017/06/04
[#81581] [Ruby trunk Bug#13632] Not processable interrupt queue for a thread after it's notified that FD is closed in some other thread. — sir.nickolas@...
Issue #13632 has been reported by nvashchenko (Nikolay Vashchenko).
4 messages
2017/06/05
[#81590] Re: [ruby-cvs:66197] ko1:r59023 (trunk): revert r59020 because it may fail some tests sometimes on some environment (http://ci.rvm.jp/). This revert is to check the reason of failures. — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
ko1@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2017/06/06
[#81591] Re: [ruby-cvs:66197] ko1:r59023 (trunk): revert r59020 because it may fail some tests sometimes on some environment (http://ci.rvm.jp/). This revert is to check the reason of failures.
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/06/06
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#81596] Re: [ruby-cvs:66203] Re: Re: ko1:r59023 (trunk): revert r59020 because it may fail some tests sometimes on some environment (http://ci.rvm.jp/). This revert is to check the reason of failures.
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/06/06
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#81825] [Ruby trunk Feature#13697] [PATCH]: futex based thread primitives — normalperson@...
Issue #13697 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
3 messages
2017/06/29
[ruby-core:81548] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12589] VM performance improvement proposal
From:
Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date:
2017-06-03 01:38:50 UTC
List:
ruby-core #81548
vmakarov@redhat.com wrote: > I've updated README.md of the project. I added performance (wall, CPU time, memory consumption) comparison of the current state of MJIT with some other MRI versions (v2.0, base) and implementations (JRuby, Graal, OMR) on different benchmarks including OPTCARROT. Thanks. Btw, have you explored the GNU lightning JIT at all? http://www.gnu.org/software/lightning/ I'm on the mailing list and it doesn't seem very active, though... > I hope it will be interesting and save time if somebody decides to evaluate MJIT. > > You can find the performance section on https://github.com/vnmakarov/ruby#update-31-may-2017 I encountered a new compatibility problem with gcc 4.9 on Debian stable with -Werror=incompatible-pointer-types not being supported. Also, my previous comment about C99 "restrict" not working on my setup still applies. Sorry, I haven't had more time to look at your work; but I guess it's mostly ko1's job since I'm no a compiler/VM expert; just a *nix plumber. Thanks again. Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>