[#69616] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11258] add 'x' mode character for O_EXCL — cremno@...
Issue #11258 has been updated by cremno phobia.
3 messages
2015/06/16
[#69643] [Ruby trunk - Misc #11276] [RFC] compile.c: convert to use ccan/list — normalperson@...
Issue #11276 has been updated by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2015/06/17
[#69751] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11001] 2.2.1 Segmentation fault in reserve_stack() function. — kubo@...
Issue #11001 has been updated by Takehiro Kubo.
3 messages
2015/06/27
[ruby-core:69571] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11048] blocks raise on missing and extra keyword args
From:
matz@...
Date:
2015-06-13 16:06:48 UTC
List:
ruby-core #69571
Issue #11048 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
For example, `loop` method passes loop counter to the block. You can safely ignore this by arity tolerance. This is a reason behind it. But there's no benefit for keyword arguments tolerance, as far as I see, but demerit of late error detection.
Matz.
----------------------------------------
Bug #11048: blocks raise on missing and extra keyword args
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11048#change-52909
* Author: bug hit
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto
* ruby -v: ruby 2.2.1p85 (2015-02-26 revision 49769) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
blocks intentionally tolerate arity mismatches
```
irb(main):001:0> proc{|a, b| [a, b]}.(1)
[
[0] 1,
[1] nil
]
irb(main):003:0> proc{|a, b|[a, b]}.(1, 2, 3)
[
[0] 1,
[1] 2
]
```
so why not missing keyword args?
```
irb(main):002:0> proc{|a:, b:|[a, b]}.(a: 1)
ArgumentError: missing keyword: b
irb(main):004:0> proc{|a:, b:|[a, b]}.(a: 1, b: 1, c: 1)
ArgumentError: unknown keyword: c
```
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/