[#66126] Creation/Conversion methods/functions table for Ruby types — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2014/11/07
[#66248] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10423] [PATCH] opt_str_lit*: avoid literal string allocations — normalperson@...
Issue #10423 has been updated by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/11/13
[#66595] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10557] [Open] Block not given when the argument is a string — bartosz@...
Issue #10557 has been reported by Bartosz Kopinski.
3 messages
2014/11/30
[ruby-core:66271] Re: Remove REXML instead of patching it
From:
Zachary Scott <e@...>
Date:
2014-11-13 22:21:34 UTC
List:
ruby-core #66271
Could you open a feature request on bugs.ruby-lang.org please? Maybe there's al ready an existing ticket.. On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Michael Grosser <michael@grosser.it> wrote: > There have been at least 3 rexml vulerabilities to date, > having to patch ruby just to make sure it's not being used is taking a lot > of time/effort. > > Afaik most people do not use xml anyway (and especially not rexml), just for > comparison: it would make much more sense to have json included, but it's > not. > > So let's just drop it & make it a gem.