[#66126] Creation/Conversion methods/functions table for Ruby types — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2014/11/07
[#66248] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10423] [PATCH] opt_str_lit*: avoid literal string allocations — normalperson@...
Issue #10423 has been updated by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/11/13
[#66595] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10557] [Open] Block not given when the argument is a string — bartosz@...
Issue #10557 has been reported by Bartosz Kopinski.
3 messages
2014/11/30
[ruby-core:66185] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10370] [PATCH] We don't need to check whether rb_block_call exists
From:
mail@...
Date:
2014-11-10 23:09:12 UTC
List:
ruby-core #66185
Issue #10370 has been updated by gogo tanaka. Hi, I just wanna check there is any problems? if so please feel free to ask me. I'm totally OK you think my propose is improper and make it rejected. note: I'm not in a hurry. take your time :) ---------------------------------------- Feature #10370: [PATCH] We don't need to check whether rb_block_call exists https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10370#change-49884 * Author: gogo tanaka * Status: Open * Priority: Low * Assignee: * Category: ext * Target version: ---------------------------------------- As far as I know, `rb_iterate` replaced by `rb_block_call` API between Ruby 1.8 and 1.9. And maintenance of Ruby versions 1.8 ended. So I think we don't need to check whether rb_block_call exists. ---Files-------------------------------- dont_need_check_whether_rb_block_call_exists.patch (1.45 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/