[#43120] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6124][Open] What is the purpose of "fake" gems in Ruby — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>

27 messages 2012/03/07

[#43142] Questions about thread performance (with benchmark included) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

A while ago I've written an article entitled "How Nokogiri and JRuby

10 messages 2012/03/08

[#43148] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6126][Open] Introduce yes/no constants aliases for true/false — Egor Homakov <homakov@...>

16 messages 2012/03/09

[#43238] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6130][Open] inspect using to_s is pain — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>

21 messages 2012/03/11

[#43313] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6150][Open] add Enumerable#grep_v — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>

17 messages 2012/03/15

[#43325] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6154][Open] Eliminate extending WaitReadable/Writable at runtime — Charles Nutter <headius@...>

25 messages 2012/03/16

[#43334] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6155][Open] Enumerable::Lazy#flat_map raises an exception when an element does not respond to #each — Dan Kubb <dan.kubb@...>

9 messages 2012/03/16

[#43370] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6166][Open] Enumerator::Lazy#pinch — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>

15 messages 2012/03/17

[#43373] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6168][Open] Segfault in OpenSSL bindings — Nguma Abojo <git.email.address@...>

14 messages 2012/03/17

[#43454] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6174][Open] Fix collision of ConditionVariable#wait timeout and #signal (+ other cosmetic changes) — "funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov)" <funny.falcon@...>

10 messages 2012/03/18

[#43497] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6179][Open] File::pos broken in Windows 1.9.3p125 — "jmthomas (Jason Thomas)" <jmthomas@...>

24 messages 2012/03/20

[#43502] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6180][Open] to_b for converting objects to a boolean value — "AaronLasseigne (Aaron Lasseigne)" <aaron.lasseigne@...>

17 messages 2012/03/20

[#43529] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6183][Open] Enumerator::Lazy performance issue — "gregolsen (Innokenty Mikhailov)" <anotheroneman@...>

36 messages 2012/03/21

[#43543] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6184][Open] [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.9.3p165 (2012-03-18 revision 35078) [x86_64-darwin11.3.0] — "Gebor (Pierre-Henry Frohring)" <frohring.pierrehenry@...>

8 messages 2012/03/21

[#43672] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6201][Open] do_something then return :special_case (include "then" operator) — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>

12 messages 2012/03/26

[#43678] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6203][Open] Array#values_at does not handle ranges with end index past the end of the array — "ferrous26 (Mark Rada)" <markrada26@...>

15 messages 2012/03/26

[#43794] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6216][Open] SystemStackError backtraces should not be reduced to one line — "postmodern (Hal Brodigan)" <postmodern.mod3@...>

15 messages 2012/03/28

[#43814] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6219][Open] Return value of Hash#store — "MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet)" <Martin.Bosslet@...>

20 messages 2012/03/28

[#43858] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6222][Open] Use ++ to connect statements — "gcao (Guoliang Cao)" <gcao99@...>

12 messages 2012/03/29

[#43904] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6225][Open] Hash#+ — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>

36 messages 2012/03/29

[#43951] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6228][Open] [mingw] Errno::EBADF in ruby/test_io.rb on ruby_1_9_3 — "jonforums (Jon Forums)" <redmine@...>

28 messages 2012/03/30

[#43996] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6236][Open] WEBrick::HTTPServer swallows Exception — "regularfry (Alex Young)" <alex@...>

13 messages 2012/03/31

[ruby-core:43820] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6168] Segfault in OpenSSL bindings

From: "coldnebo (Larry Kyrala)" <larry.kyrala@...>
Date: 2012-03-28 21:49:39 UTC
List: ruby-core #43820
Issue #6168 has been updated by coldnebo (Larry Kyrala).

File ruby-lang-6168.zip added

Ok, I think I have a test case for you Martin... I was able to reproduce this again Google's IMAP server, so I created a dummy test account and a simple test case.  Note: it only segfaults when in debug, I have no idea why? (is the debugger trying to tack something on to allocated buffers being passed to openssl?)

Anyway, download the zip, unzip it and look at the contained error.log for a record of what I ran and how I reproduced the problem.

Let me know if you have questions.
----------------------------------------
Bug #6168: Segfault in OpenSSL bindings
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6168#change-25324

Author: amasal (Nguma Abojo)
Status: Assigned
Priority: High
Assignee: MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet)
Category: ext
Target version: 1.9.3
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3p125 (2012-02-16 revision 34643) [x86_64-linux]


Hello,

A few days ago I updated my Arch Linux server to OpenSSL 1.0.1-1 and Ruby 1.9.3_p125-2. Since then I have been experiencing an odd service failure where a Ruby TLS service of mine would disconnect users with "invalid MAC" exceptions. Shortly after or even before that exception occurs, it segfaults in openssl/buffering.rb. I am not entirely sure whether this is a Ruby OpenSSL bindings bug or even an OpenSSL bug or simply a user error. This is what it prints:

/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/openssl/buffering.rb:318: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.3p125 (2012-02-16 revision 34643) [x86_64-linux]

-- Control frame information -----------------------------------------------
c:0016 p:---- s:0081 b:0081 l:000080 d:000080 CFUNC  :syswrite
c:0015 p:0181 s:0077 b:0077 l:000076 d:000076 METHOD /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/openssl/buffering.rb:318
c:0014 p:0030 s:0068 b:0068 l:000067 d:000067 METHOD /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/openssl/buffering.rb:415
c:0013 p:0046 s:0063 b:0063 l:000062 d:000062 METHOD /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/nil/communication.rb:87
c:0012 p:0011 s:0057 b:0057 l:000051 d:000056 BLOCK  /home/void/code/warehouse/notification/NotificationClient.rb:29
c:0011 p:0019 s:0055 b:0055 l:000054 d:000054 METHOD <internal:prelude>:10
c:0010 p:0013 s:0052 b:0052 l:000051 d:000051 METHOD /home/void/code/warehouse/notification/NotificationClient.rb:29
c:0009 p:0088 s:0048 b:0048 l:000047 d:000047 METHOD /home/void/code/warehouse/notification/NotificationServer.rb:200
c:0008 p:---- s:0039 b:0039 l:000038 d:000038 FINISH
c:0007 p:---- s:0037 b:0037 l:000036 d:000036 CFUNC  :call
c:0006 p:0218 s:0032 b:0032 l:000031 d:000031 METHOD /home/void/code/warehouse/notification    /NotificationServer.rb:185
c:0005 p:0146 s:0023 b:0023 l:000022 d:000022 METHOD /home/void/code/warehouse/notification    /NotificationServer.rb:162
c:0004 p:0171 s:0014 b:0014 l:000013 d:000013 METHOD /home/void/code/warehouse/notification    /NotificationServer.rb:139
c:0003 p:0012 s:0006 b:0006 l:000118 d:000005 BLOCK  /home/void/code/warehouse/notification    /NotificationServer.rb:102
c:0002 p:---- s:0004 b:0004 l:000003 d:000003 FINISH
c:0001 p:---- s:0002 b:0002 l:000001 d:000001 TOP

-- Ruby level backtrace information ----------------------------------------
/home/void/code/warehouse/notification/NotificationServer.rb:102:in `block in runServer'
/home/void/code/warehouse/notification/NotificationServer.rb:139:in `handleClient'
/home/void/code/warehouse/notification/NotificationServer.rb:162:in     `processClientCommunication'
/home/void/code/warehouse/notification/NotificationServer.rb:185:in `processClientInput'
/home/void/code/warehouse/notification/NotificationServer.rb:185:in `call'
/home/void/code/warehouse/notification/NotificationServer.rb:200:in `rpcHandler'
/home/void/code/warehouse/notification/NotificationClient.rb:29:in `sendData'
<internal:prelude>:10:in `synchronize'
/home/void/code/warehouse/notification/NotificationClient.rb:29:in `block in sendData'
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/nil/communication.rb:87:in `sendData'
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/openssl/buffering.rb:415:in `print'
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/openssl/buffering.rb:318:in `do_write'
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/openssl/buffering.rb:318:in `syswrite'

-- C level backtrace information -------------------------------------------
/usr/lib/libruby.so.1.9(+0x158ee9) [0x7f3aa715fee9]
/usr/lib/libruby.so.1.9(+0x59f99) [0x7f3aa7060f99]
/usr/lib/libruby.so.1.9(rb_bug+0xb7) [0x7f3aa70619c7]
/usr/lib/libruby.so.1.9(+0xf945f) [0x7f3aa710045f]
/lib/libc.so.6(+0x349f0) [0x7f3aa6c9a9f0]
/usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0(RC4+0x431) [0x7f3aa4db6c31]


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread