[#115244] [Ruby master Feature#19987] add sample method to Range — "horv77@... (Andras Horvath) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Issue #19987 has been reported by horv77@protonmail.com (Andras Horvath).
6 messages
2023/11/05
[#115247] [Ruby master Feature#19988] AI for inner code behavior analysis at runtime — "horv77@... (Andras Horvath) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Issue #19988 has been reported by horv77@protonmail.com (Andras Horvath).
3 messages
2023/11/05
[#115404] Ruby 3.2.2 - rbconfig.rb's MAKEFILE_CONFIG — Jay Mav via ruby-core <ruby-core@...>
Hello Ruby Dev Team,
4 messages
2023/11/17
[ruby-core:115424] [Ruby master Bug#19969] Regression of memory usage with Ruby 3.1
From:
"usa (Usaku NAKAMURA) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Date:
2023-11-20 12:11:47 UTC
List:
ruby-core #115424
Issue #19969 has been updated by usa (Usaku NAKAMURA).
Backport changed from 3.0: DONTNEED, 3.1: REQUIRED, 3.2: DONE to 3.0: DONTNEED, 3.1: DONE, 3.2: DONE
ruby_3_1 1cae5e7ceaca7304108fdec35d4858a9e4ff7fe0 merged revision(s) 9eac9d71786a8dbec520d0541a91149f01adf8ea.
----------------------------------------
Bug #19969: Regression of memory usage with Ruby 3.1
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19969#change-105355
* Author: hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA)
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Backport: 3.0: DONTNEED, 3.1: DONE, 3.2: DONE
----------------------------------------
Our company that is ANDPAD, Inc. encountered to increase memory usage after upgrading Ruby 3.2 from 3.0 on our Rails application. This increase size is about 20%.
My colleague found this [root cause](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16996) and reproduction code:
```
$ ruby -v -rset -e 's1 = Set.new(10000.times); s2 = Set.new(9999.times); Array.new(10000) { s1 - s2 - [0] }; puts `ps -o rss= -p #{$$}`.to_i'
ruby 3.0.6p216 (2023-06-29 revision bdfe1958a8) +JIT [arm64-darwin22]
248096
$ ruby -v -rset -e 's1 = Set.new(10000.times); s2 = Set.new(9999.times); Array.new(10000) { s1 - s2 - [0] }; puts `ps -o rss= -p #{$$}`.to_i'
ruby 3.2.2 (2023-07-05 revision 2f603bc4d7) +YJIT [arm64-darwin22]
2949280
```
Should we revert #16996 for Ruby 3.1 or later? I'm not sure this increased memory usage is reasonable with performance improvement.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
______________________________________________
ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/