[#111472] [Ruby master Bug#19274] Error installing ruby 3.2.0 on RH 8 — "aalllop (Alberto Allegue) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Issue #19274 has been reported by aalllop (Alberto Allegue).
5 messages
2022/12/28
[#111508] Data support for versions before 3.2.0 — Eustáquio Rangel via ruby-core <ruby-core@...>
I was wondering that every piece of code (gems, etc) that use the new Data =
3 messages
2022/12/29
[ruby-core:111508] Data support for versions before 3.2.0
From:
Eustáquio Rangel via ruby-core <ruby-core@...>
Date:
2022-12-29 17:45:29 UTC
List:
ruby-core #111508
I was wondering that every piece of code (gems, etc) that use the new Data =
object from now on will demand a mandatory upgrade to >=3D 3.2.0. It's a go=
od thing upgrade the language versions, but often we can't do it for many r=
easons and would love to use the new code (updated or new gems) on our proj=
ects current versions.
On the original Data PR I saw one of the reasons asking Data be a language =
feature and not a gem ("nobody will even try to use a gem for representing =
it with, unless the framework/library used already provides one"), I agree =
with that, but I'm curious if i there is any plan to support older language=
versions, like releasing a gem to mimic main Data features into older lang=
uage versions and not force a mandatory upgrade to >=3D 3.2.0. I searched o=
n rubygems but didn't find one like that.
Btw, looks like what we had before with Fibers and Ractors, but seems to me=
Data will have an easier and faster adoption.
Thanks.
______________________________________________
ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/
Attachments (2)
publickey - EmailAddress(s=taq@eustaquiorangel.com) - 0x64A4502F.asc
(709 Bytes, application/pgp-keys)
signature.asc
(249 Bytes, application/pgp-signature)