[#111472] [Ruby master Bug#19274] Error installing ruby 3.2.0 on RH 8 — "aalllop (Alberto Allegue) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Issue #19274 has been reported by aalllop (Alberto Allegue).
5 messages
2022/12/28
[#111508] Data support for versions before 3.2.0 — Eustáquio Rangel via ruby-core <ruby-core@...>
I was wondering that every piece of code (gems, etc) that use the new Data =
3 messages
2022/12/29
[ruby-core:111254] [Ruby master Feature#12813] Calling chunk_while, slice_after, slice_before, slice_when with no block
From:
"sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)" <noreply@...>
Date:
2022-12-11 08:50:16 UTC
List:
ruby-core #111254
Issue #12813 has been updated by sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada). I think this has already been implemented by now. It should be closed. ---------------------------------------- Feature #12813: Calling chunk_while, slice_after, slice_before, slice_when with no block https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12813#change-100548 * Author: marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune) * Status: Assigned * Priority: Normal * Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) ---------------------------------------- Currently, `chunk_while`, `slice_after`, `slice_before`, `slice_when` all require a block. If one needs the index within the block, there is no good way to do this; `enum.each_with_index.chunk_while` would have indices in the results, so `enum.enum_for(:chunk_while).with_index` is the best solution. I feel that we should return `enum_for(:chunk_while)`. This is strictly more useful than raising as we currently do. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ ______________________________________________ ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/