From: "byroot (Jean Boussier) via ruby-core" Date: 2022-12-20T10:26:01+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:111344] [Ruby master Feature#19245] Strict mode for Array#pack that doesn't silently truncate numbers that are too large for the given directive Issue #19245 has been updated by byroot (Jean Boussier). > The word ���specified��� makes confusion. Apologies. > Usually we don���t add ! for stricter behavior. Indeed. If anything it's the version that silently truncate that would be the "more dangerous" version of it, which is usually what `!` suffix tend to mean in ruby-core. But that's not really an option. So I guess `strict: true` is the way to go. ---------------------------------------- Feature #19245: Strict mode for Array#pack that doesn't silently truncate numbers that are too large for the given directive https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19245#change-100718 * Author: byroot (Jean Boussier) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- ```ruby >> [256].pack("C").unpack1("C") => 0 >> [257].pack("C").unpack1("C") => 1 ``` This is specified: ```ruby it "encodes the least significant 32 bits of a negative number" do [ [[-0x0000_0021], "\xdf\xff\xff\xff"], [[-0x0000_4321], "\xdf\xbc\xff\xff"], [[-0x0065_4321], "\xdf\xbc\x9a\xff"], [[-0x7865_4321], "\xdf\xbc\x9a\x87"] ].should be_computed_by(:pack, pack_format()) end ``` But not documented in `Array#pack`. I think that in many case this may lead to silent bugs. ### Possible solutions We could have a strict version of `pack`, either `pack(template, strict: true)` or `pack!(template)`. Or alternatively if we think this is never a desired behavior, we could change `pack` to first warn on truncation and later raise. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ ______________________________________________ ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/