[#108461] [Ruby master Bug#18762] Add an Array#undigits that compliments Integer#digits — "shan (Shannon Skipper)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18762 has been reported by shan (Shannon Skipper).

8 messages 2022/05/02

[#108499] [Ruby master Bug#18767] IO.foreach hangs up when passes limit=0 — "andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18767 has been reported by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin).

9 messages 2022/05/10

[#108500] [Ruby master Bug#18768] Inconsistent behavior of IO, StringIO and String each_line methods when return paragraph and chomp: true passed — "andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18768 has been reported by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin).

7 messages 2022/05/10

[#108511] [Ruby master Feature#18773] deconstruct to receive a range — "kddeisz (Kevin Newton)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18773 has been reported by kddeisz (Kevin Newton).

12 messages 2022/05/11

[#108514] [Ruby master Feature#18774] Add Queue#pop(timeout:) — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18774 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

17 messages 2022/05/11

[#108522] [Ruby master Feature#18776] Object Shapes — "jemmai (Jemma Issroff)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18776 has been reported by jemmai (Jemma Issroff).

25 messages 2022/05/11

[#108543] [Ruby master Bug#18779] `GC.compact` and other compaction related methods should be defined as rb_f_notimplement on non supported platforms. — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18779 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

10 messages 2022/05/13

[#108546] [Ruby master Bug#18780] Incorrect binding receiver for C API rb_eval_string() — "daveola (David Stellar)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18780 has been reported by daveola (David Stellar).

21 messages 2022/05/13

[#108549] [Ruby master Bug#18781] MJIT tests failing with Ubuntu focal with gcc-11 and some flags — "jaruga (Jun Aruga)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18781 has been reported by jaruga (Jun Aruga).

8 messages 2022/05/14

[#108552] [Ruby master Bug#18782] Race conditions in autoload when loading the same feature with multiple threads. — "ioquatix (Samuel Williams)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18782 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

11 messages 2022/05/14

[#108565] [Ruby master Bug#18784] `FileUtils.rm_f` and `FileUtils.rm_rf` should not mask exceptions — deivid <noreply@...>

Issue #18784 has been reported by deivid (David Rodr鱈guez).

33 messages 2022/05/16

[#108590] [Ruby master Feature#18788] Support passing Regexp options as String to Regexp.new — janosch-x <noreply@...>

Issue #18788 has been reported by janosch-x (Janosch M端ller).

10 messages 2022/05/17

[#108659] [Ruby master Bug#18798] `UnboundMethod#==` with inherited classes — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18798 has been reported by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).

16 messages 2022/05/24

[#108708] [Ruby master Bug#18808] Cannot compile ruby 3.1.2 on powerpc64le-linux without disabling the jit features — "npn (John Davis)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18808 has been reported by npn (John Davis).

17 messages 2022/05/26

[#108724] [Ruby master Feature#18809] Add Numeric#ceildiv — "kyanagi (Kouhei Yanagita)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18809 has been reported by kyanagi (Kouhei Yanagita).

9 messages 2022/05/27

[#108728] [Ruby master Bug#18810] Make `Kernel#p` interruptable. — "ioquatix (Samuel Williams)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18810 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

13 messages 2022/05/28

[ruby-core:108483] [Ruby master Bug#18061] Execshield test: libruby.so.N.N.N: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found

From: "ioquatix (Samuel Williams)" <noreply@...>
Date: 2022-05-09 05:05:31 UTC
List: ruby-core #108483
Issue #18061 has been updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).


I investigated this issue today.

It doesn't appear to just be a matter of adding a few properties, this actually involves correctly implementing an intel-specific shadow stack.

Assembly coroutine backend and x86 CET support (in QEMU): https://lists.sr.ht/~philmd/qemu/patches/4691

My understanding is we'd need to implement the shadow stack handling in the coroutine code. Or maybe we can just specify that it's not supported and that's also okay?

I think in the future, it's more likely that C compilers will provide native coroutine functions - in this situation maybe we can just use those instead of our native implementations and this problem will go away.

(1) Can we fix this issue without introducing shadow stacks?
(2) Is that sufficient to pass the tests above?

----------------------------------------
Bug #18061:  Execshield test: libruby.so.N.N.N: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18061#change-97527

* Author: jaruga (Jun Aruga)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: REQUIRED, 3.0: REQUIRED
----------------------------------------
I found an issue in our company's internal test called "execshield" by a security tool annobin - annocheck command [1][2].

```
Hardened: libruby.so.2.7.4: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found
```

Here is the reproducer on the upstream latest master, commit is 5f2987d6c2ae9ace3178ac3e1bbb4ac7079101eb,

```
$ autoconf
$ ./configure --enable-shared
$ make

$ ls libruby.so.3.1.0
libruby.so.3.1.0*
```

If you are using Red Hat based Linux distro, it's easy to install by the RPM package like this.

```
$ sudo dnf -y install annobin-annocheck
```

```
$ sudo yum -y install annobin-annocheck
```

Then

```
$ annocheck libruby.so.3.1.0
```

If you are using other Linux distros such as Ubuntu, you can use it by a container I prepared.

Prepare the following `Dockerfile`.

```
$ cat Dockerfile 
FROM docker.io/fedora:34

RUN cat /etc/fedora-release
RUN dnf -y install annobin-annocheck
WORKDIR /work
```

Then build the container image with the `Dockerfile` and run the annocheck command for the `libruby.so.3.1.0` on your host environment. The `-v` is an option for bind mount between host and container environment.

```
$ docker build --rm -t fedora-annocheck .

$ docker run --rm -t -v $(pwd):/work fedora-annocheck annocheck /work/libruby.so.3.1.0
annocheck: Version 9.79.
Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: bind-now test because not linked with -Wl,-z,now 
Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: notes test because gaps were detected in the annobin coverage 
Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: cf-protection test because no .note.gnu.property section = no control flow information 
Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found 
Hardened: Rerun annocheck with --verbose to see more information on the tests.
```

The message `Hardened: libruby.so.3.1.0: FAIL: property-note test because no .note.gnu.property section found` is what I found in our internal test. For other FAIL messages, maybe it can be fixed by changing how to build.

Asking a colleague, I was told that the `coroutine/*/Context.S` files such as [coroutine/x86/Context.S](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/master/coroutine/x86/Context.S) cause the failure. Do you have any idea how to fix this? Thanks.

* [1] https://sourceware.org/annobin/
* [2] You can see `man annocheck` or https://www.mankier.com/1/annocheck .

---Files--------------------------------
0001-Add-.note.gnu.property-sections.patch (2.64 KB)
0001-Add-.note.gnu.property-sections.patch (3.69 KB)


-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread