From: "kddeisz (Kevin Newton)" Date: 2022-03-10T02:18:28+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:107811] [Ruby master Feature#18589] Finer-grained constant invalidation Issue #18589 has been updated by kddeisz (Kevin Newton). @Dan0042 yeah sorry, I was looking at different numbers and got wires crossed. ---------------------------------------- Feature #18589: Finer-grained constant invalidation https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18589#change-96740 * Author: kddeisz (Kevin Newton) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- This is related to https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/5433. ## Current behavior Caches depend on a global counter. All constant mutations cause all caches to be invalidated. ```ruby class A B = 1 end def foo A::B # inline cache depends on global counter end foo # populate inline cache foo # hit inline cache C = 1 # global counter increments, all caches are invalidated foo # misses inline cache due to `C = 1` ``` ## Proposed behavior Caches depend on name components. Only constant mutations with corresponding names will invalidate the cache. ```ruby class A B = 1 end def foo A::B # inline cache depends constants named "A" and "B" end foo # populate inline cache foo # hit inline cache C = 1 # caches that depend on the name "C" are invalidated foo # hits inline cache because IC only depends on "A" and "B" ``` Examples of breaking the new cache: ```ruby module C # Breaks `foo` cache because "A" constant is set and the cache in foo depends # on "A" and "B" class A; end end B = 1 ``` We expect the new cache scheme to be invalidated less often because names aren't frequently reused. With the cache being invalidated less, we can rely on its stability more to keep our constant references fast and reduce the need to throw away generated code in YJIT. ## Performance benchmarks The following benchmark (included in this pull request) performs about 2x faster than master. ```ruby CONSTANT1 = 1 CONSTANT2 = 1 CONSTANT3 = 1 CONSTANT4 = 1 CONSTANT5 = 1 def constants [CONSTANT1, CONSTANT2, CONSTANT3, CONSTANT4, CONSTANT5] end 500_000.times do constants INVALIDATE = true end ``` In terms of macro benchmarks, I ran with this code on railsbench and there was not a statistically significant different in startup time or overall runtime performance. @byroot also ran performance benchmarks on our production application. He noticed that there were several cache busts related to Object#extend (from core libraries), ActiveRecord::Relation#extending (from Rails), and autoload (from various gems, both internal and external). After a lot of work, the cache busts went down: ![Cache bust changes](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/19192189/156726006-75aab77a-7fdf-47cf-88cb-1175f193c18a.png) but they're still frequent enough that it's a problem. These changes had a measurable performance difference in request speed: ![Request speed changes](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/19192189/156727814-adb0f8b5-9012-4d2c-ab9c-b29d80748a5c.png) ## Memory benchmarks In terms of memory, this includes an increase in VM size by about 500KiB when running on railsbench. This is because we're now tracking cache associations ({ ID => IC[] }) on the VM to know how to invalidate specific caches when constants change. I booted Shopify's core monolith with this branch as well. It increased proportional to the number of constant caches found in the application. For each constant cache 1 level deep (e.g., `Foo`) the increase is about 33 bytes. For a constant cache 2 levels deep (e.g., `Foo::Bar`) the increase is about 67 bytes. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: