[#107867] Fwd: [ruby-cvs:91197] 8f59482f5d (master): add some tests for Unicode Version 14.0.0 — Martin J. Dürst <duerst@...>
To everybody taking care of continuous integration:
3 messages
2022/03/13
[#108090] [Ruby master Bug#18666] No rule to make target 'yaml/yaml.h', needed by 'api.o' — duerst <noreply@...>
Issue #18666 has been reported by duerst (Martin D端rst).
7 messages
2022/03/28
[#108117] [Ruby master Feature#18668] Merge `io-nonblock` gems into core — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@...>
Issue #18668 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
22 messages
2022/03/30
[ruby-core:108148] [Ruby master Bug#18673] Anonymous block forwarding fails when combined with keyword arguments
From:
"brasic (Carl Brasic)" <noreply@...>
Date:
2022-03-31 22:19:34 UTC
List:
ruby-core #108148
Issue #18673 has been reported by brasic (Carl Brasic). ---------------------------------------- Bug #18673: Anonymous block forwarding fails when combined with keyword arguments https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18673 * Author: brasic (Carl Brasic) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Hello! I tried to use the anonymous block forwarding feature introduced in https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11256 and released with ruby 3.1. Unfortunately it appears to unexpectedly fail during parsing when used in a method that also accepts keyword arguments. I don't see this limitation documented so I presume it is a bug. I've attached a simple reproduction script. /cc @jeremyevans0 as author. ``` $ ruby -v ruby 3.1.1p18 (2022-02-18 revision 53f5fc4236) [x86_64-linux] $ ruby anon_repro.rb anon_repro.rb:14: no anonymous block parameter ``` Carl ---Files-------------------------------- anon_repro.rb (223 Bytes) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>