From: "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" Date: 2022-04-05T09:52:36+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:108175] [Ruby master Bug#18625] ruby2_keywords does not unmark the hash if the receiving method has a *rest parameter Issue #18625 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze). I merged https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/5684, which is Jeremy's PR + a needed update of rspec-mocks + [a NEWS entry](https://github.com/eregon/ruby/blob/3d0aac928f7592838deff2cb84b57f0678c348cc/NEWS.md). This is the only way to really assess the impact on gems/apps depending on this bug, and to let gems/apps to find and add the missing `ruby2_keywords` (asking gems or even rails to use a branch of ruby is a lot of overhead). Because this was a bug, and there is no other way to fix it, and this fix will help migration to other forms of delegation, I think it is very unlikely we would revert this change, but it remains a possibility until the 3.2 release. A good technique to find the potentially-missing `ruby2_keywords` is to run the test suite, for where it fails find the last method which must receive keyword arguments, use `puts nil, caller, nil` there, and check each method on the call chain which must delegate keywords is correctly marked as `ruby2_keywords`. ---------------------------------------- Bug #18625: ruby2_keywords does not unmark the hash if the receiving method has a *rest parameter https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18625#change-97148 * Author: Eregon (Benoit Daloze) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- The code below shows the inconsistency. In all cases the `marked` Hash is copied at call sites using `some_call(*args)`, however for the case of `splat` it keeps the ruby2_keywords flag to true, and not false as expected. This can be observed in user code and will hurt migration from `ruby2_keywords` to other ways of delegation (`(...)` and `(*args, **kwargs)`). I believe this is another manifestation of #16466. ```ruby ruby2_keywords def foo(*args) args end def single(arg) arg end def splat(*args) args.last end def kwargs(**kw) kw end h = { a: 1 } args = foo(**h) marked = args.last Hash.ruby2_keywords_hash?(marked) # => true after_usage = single(*args) after_usage == h # => true after_usage.equal?(marked) # => false p Hash.ruby2_keywords_hash?(after_usage) # => false after_usage = splat(*args) after_usage == h # => true after_usage.equal?(marked) # => true, BUG, should be false p Hash.ruby2_keywords_hash?(after_usage) # => true, BUG, should be false after_usage = kwargs(*args) after_usage == h # => true after_usage.equal?(marked) # => false p Hash.ruby2_keywords_hash?(after_usage) # => false Hash.ruby2_keywords_hash?(marked) # => true ``` I'm implementing Ruby 3 kwargs in TruffleRuby and this came up as an inconsistency in specs. In TruffleRuby it's also basically not possible to implement this behavior, because at a splat call site where we check for a last Hash argument marked as ruby2_keywords, we have no idea of which method will be called yet, and so cannot differentiate behavior based on that. cc @jeremyevans0 @mame -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: