[#107430] [Ruby master Feature#18566] Merge `io-wait` gem into core IO — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18566 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

22 messages 2022/02/02

[#107434] [Ruby master Bug#18567] Depending on default gems when not needed considered harmful — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18567 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

31 messages 2022/02/02

[#107443] [Ruby master Feature#18568] Explore lazy RubyGems boot to reduce need for --disable-gems — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18568 has been reported by headius (Charles Nutter).

13 messages 2022/02/02

[#107481] [Ruby master Feature#18571] Removed the bundled sources from release package after Ruby 3.2 — "hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18571 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).

9 messages 2022/02/04

[#107490] [Ruby master Bug#18572] Performance regression when invoking refined methods — "palkan (Vladimir Dementyev)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18572 has been reported by palkan (Vladimir Dementyev).

12 messages 2022/02/05

[#107514] [Ruby master Feature#18576] Rename `ASCII-8BIT` encoding to `BINARY` — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18576 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

47 messages 2022/02/08

[#107536] [Ruby master Feature#18579] Concatenation of ASCII-8BIT strings shouldn't behave differently depending on string contents — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18579 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson).

11 messages 2022/02/09

[#107547] [Ruby master Bug#18580] Range#include? inconsistency for String ranges — "zverok (Victor Shepelev)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18580 has been reported by zverok (Victor Shepelev).

10 messages 2022/02/10

[#107603] [Ruby master Feature#18589] Finer-grained constant invalidation — "kddeisz (Kevin Newton)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18589 has been reported by kddeisz (Kevin Newton).

17 messages 2022/02/16

[#107624] [Ruby master Bug#18590] String#downcase and CAPITAL LETTER I WITH DOT ABOVE — "andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18590 has been reported by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin).

13 messages 2022/02/17

[#107651] [Ruby master Misc#18591] DevMeeting-2022-03-17 — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18591 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

11 messages 2022/02/18

[#107682] [Ruby master Feature#18595] Alias `String#-@` as `String#dedup` — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18595 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

15 messages 2022/02/21

[#107699] [Ruby master Feature#18597] Strings need a named method like `dup` that doesn't duplicate if receiver is mutable — "danh337 (Dan H)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18597 has been reported by danh337 (Dan H).

18 messages 2022/02/21

[ruby-core:107710] [Ruby master Feature#18596] Enhance the syntax for getting values in existing arrays.

From: "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@...>
Date: 2022-02-22 10:58:02 UTC
List: ruby-core #107710
Issue #18596 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).


sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada) wrote in #note-2:
> This idea is a duplicate of #15950

Actually not, the suggested semantic is equivalent to `array[2..size-1]` in this issue, not `array[-2..-1]` or so.
Which makes it all the clearer a negative number there is just confusing.

Anyway, this was already rejected by matz in #15950 and it seems the OP didn't know the Range is the idiomatic and existing way for this.



----------------------------------------
Feature #18596: Enhance the syntax for getting values in existing arrays.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18596#change-96631

* Author: jackmaple (maple jack)
* Status: Rejected
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
Hello everyone.
Is it possible to enhance the value syntax in arrays, currently we can pass one or two parameters in the array to take values.
``` ruby
[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9][2]    #result=3
[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9][2,8]  #result=[3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9][-1]   #result=9
```
Although negative values are supported (from back to front), they are not supported as the second parameter.
The following example is wrong and will not get the desired result.
**Is it possible to make the second parameter also support negative values?**
``` ruby
[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9][2,-1] #result=nil,the expected result is from index 2 to the end
```
Sometimes we want to get interval values with step size.
``` ruby
[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9][(2..8).step(2)] #result=[3, 5, 7, 9]
```
**Is it possible to add a third parameter to the array value syntax in order to simplify the syntax?**
for example:
``` ruby
[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9][2,8,2] #result=[3, 5, 7, 9]
```
thanks.




-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread

Prev Next