From: jean.boussier@... Date: 2021-04-09T13:04:03+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:103346] [Ruby master Feature#17785] Allow named parameters to be keywords Issue #17785 has been updated by byroot (Jean Boussier). Arguably it's a bit of a stretch, but how would you handle: `foo(class_, class:)`? What if instead of mangling the variable name, there would be a way to tell the parser to interpret the next word as a regular name rather than a keyword? e.g.: ```ruby def check(arg, class:) arg.is_a?(\class) end ``` `\` being a common escaping character I think it the one that would make the most sense. And that would allow to make it work with regular parameters as well: ```ruby def diff(start, \end) \end - start end ``` Even though this use case is much less important, except for documentation purposes. ---------------------------------------- Feature #17785: Allow named parameters to be keywords https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17785#change-91436 * Author: marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) ---------------------------------------- We should allow named parameters to be keywords and use add a trailing `_` to the corresponding variable: ```ruby def check(arg, class:) arg.is_a?(class_) end check(42, class: Integer) # => true ``` Currently, if we want such an API we have to use `**rest`: ```ruby def check(arg, **rest) class_ = rest.fetch(:class) { raise ArgumentError('missing keyword: :class')} if rest.size > 1 unknown = rest.keys - [:class] raise ArgumentError("unknown keyword(s): :#{unknown.join(', :')}) end arg.is_a?(class_) end ``` This is very verbose, much less convenient, much less readable, prevents `steep` from generating the proper signature, etc. We should do the same for pattern match. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: