[#103241] [Ruby master Bug#17777] 2.6.7 fails to build on macOS: implicit declaration of function 'rb_native_mutex_destroy' is invalid in C99 — eregontp@...
Issue #17777 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
17 messages
2021/04/05
[#103305] [Ruby master Feature#17785] Allow named parameters to be keywords — marcandre-ruby-core@...
Issue #17785 has been reported by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune).
21 messages
2021/04/08
[#103342] [Ruby master Feature#17790] Have a way to clear a String without resetting its capacity — jean.boussier@...
Issue #17790 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).
14 messages
2021/04/09
[#103388] [ANN] Multi-factor Authentication of bugs.ruby-lang.org — SHIBATA Hiroshi <hsbt@...>
Hello,
5 messages
2021/04/12
[#103414] Re: [ANN] Multi-factor Authentication of bugs.ruby-lang.org
— Martin J. Dürst <duerst@...>
2021/04/13
Is there a way to use this multi-factor authentication for (like me)
[#103547] List of CI sites to check — Martin J. Dürst <duerst@...>
Hello everybody,
4 messages
2021/04/22
[#103596] [Ruby master Feature#17830] Add Integer#previous and Integer#prev — rafasoaresms@...
Issue #17830 has been reported by rafasoares (Rafael Soares).
9 messages
2021/04/26
[ruby-core:103525] [Ruby master Bug#17809] Ruby 2.6.7 backported C99 code that breaks older compilers
From:
merch-redmine@...
Date:
2021-04-20 16:42:57 UTC
List:
ruby-core #103525
Issue #17809 has been updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).
Backport changed from 2.6: REQUIRED, 2.7: REQUIRED, 3.0: DONTNEED to 2.6: REQUIRED, 2.7: DONTNEED, 3.0: DONTNEED
Status changed from Open to Closed
I think this is only required for 2.6, since we switched to C99 before 2.7, so I've updated the backport field.
----------------------------------------
Bug #17809: Ruby 2.6.7 backported C99 code that breaks older compilers
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17809#change-91625
* Author: tas50 (Tim Smith)
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* ruby -v: 2.6.7
* Backport: 2.6: REQUIRED, 2.7: DONTNEED, 3.0: DONTNEED
----------------------------------------
Hey folks,
It looks like the 2.6.7 release inadvertently backported some C99 code from HEAD onto the Ruby 2.6 branch that shouldn't be requiring C99 compilers. This is causing us some pain and failures in our older versions of Chef that use Ruby 2.6 and are built without the C99 flag set on compilers.
Here's the patch we apply the 2.6.7 codebase to remove the C99 code:
https://github.com/chef/omnibus-software/blob/master/config/patches/ruby/ruby-2.6.7_c99.patch
Here's the commit that backported the C99 code:
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/fe85a3d5271c4e3aeda42ec32e9c3f9ee02b6897
The particular line in the commit causing failures:
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/fe85a3d5271c4e3aeda42ec32e9c3f9ee02b6897/hash.c#L5661
The failure we see while compiling:
```
gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-23)
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
compiling hash.c
compiling load.c
compiling marshal.c
Error:
hash.c: In function 'keylist_delete':
hash.c:5661: error: 'for' loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
hash.c:5661: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your code
gmake: *** [Makefile:419: hash.o] Error 1
gmake: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....`
```
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>