[#103241] [Ruby master Bug#17777] 2.6.7 fails to build on macOS: implicit declaration of function 'rb_native_mutex_destroy' is invalid in C99 — eregontp@...
Issue #17777 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
17 messages
2021/04/05
[#103305] [Ruby master Feature#17785] Allow named parameters to be keywords — marcandre-ruby-core@...
Issue #17785 has been reported by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune).
21 messages
2021/04/08
[#103342] [Ruby master Feature#17790] Have a way to clear a String without resetting its capacity — jean.boussier@...
Issue #17790 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).
14 messages
2021/04/09
[#103388] [ANN] Multi-factor Authentication of bugs.ruby-lang.org — SHIBATA Hiroshi <hsbt@...>
Hello,
5 messages
2021/04/12
[#103414] Re: [ANN] Multi-factor Authentication of bugs.ruby-lang.org
— Martin J. Dürst <duerst@...>
2021/04/13
SXMgdGhlcmUgYSB3YXkgdG8gdXNlIHRoaXMgbXVsdGktZmFjdG9yIGF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGZv
[#103547] List of CI sites to check — Martin J. Dürst <duerst@...>
SGVsbG8gZXZlcnlib2R5LAoKRHVlIHRvIHZhcmlvdXMgcGVyc29uYWwgcmVhc29ucywgSSBoYXZl
4 messages
2021/04/22
[#103596] [Ruby master Feature#17830] Add Integer#previous and Integer#prev — rafasoaresms@...
Issue #17830 has been reported by rafasoares (Rafael Soares).
9 messages
2021/04/26
[ruby-core:103234] [Ruby master Bug#17218] Range#step sometimes behaves unexpectedly with Rational endpoints and increment
From:
usa@...
Date:
2021-04-05 01:22:31 UTC
List:
ruby-core #103234
Issue #17218 has been updated by usa (Usaku NAKAMURA).
backported into ruby_2_6 at r67936
----------------------------------------
Bug #17218: Range#step sometimes behaves unexpectedly with Rational endpoints and increment
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17218#change-91314
* Author: rorymolinari (Rory Molinari)
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: mrkn (Kenta Murata)
* ruby -v: ruby 2.7.2p137 (2020-10-01 revision 5445e04352) [x86_64-darwin19]
* Backport: 2.5: DONTNEED, 2.6: REQUIRED, 2.7: DONE
----------------------------------------
I am using the latest stable version. The same behavior exists in 2.6.6.
```
11:28:25 $ ruby -v
ruby 2.7.2p137 (2020-10-01 revision 5445e04352) [x86_64-darwin19]
```
When creating an `Enumerator::ArithmeticSequence` with Rational endpoints and increment, sometimes inconsistent behavior results due to floating-point approximation in `#last`.
``` ruby
x = Rational(10997, 10000)
y = Rational(11, 10)
s = Rational(1, 10000)
puts "#{[x, y, s].map(&:to_f)}" # -> [1.0997, 1.1, 0.0001]
# intention: this contains exactly the precise Rational representations of 1.0997, 1.0998, 1.0999, 1.1
arith_seq = (x..y).step(s)
puts arith_seq.class # -> Enumerator::ArithmeticSequence
# Things look OK
puts arith_seq.first # -> 10997/10000
puts arith_seq.end # -> 11/10
puts arith_seq.step # -> 1/10000
# But the array that we get from #to_a is missing the last element, (11/10)
puts arith_seq.to_a.to_s # -> [(10997/10000), (5499/5000), (10999/10000)]
# This is apparently due to the value of #last
puts arith_seq.last # -> 1.0999999999999999
# The object itself is confused
puts arith_seq.size # -> 4
puts arith_seq.to_a.size # -> 3
```
The issue is in the `Enumerator::ArithmeticSequence` instance we get when we call `Range#step` without a block. The `Range#step` method passes the right things when it gets a block.
``` ruby
block_vals = []
(x..y).step(s) { |v| block_vals << v }
puts block_vals.to_s # -> [(10997/10000), (5499/5000), (10999/10000), (11/10)]
```
I would expect `arith_seq.last` to be the exact value `Rational(11, 10)`. After all, `arith_seq` was created from a `Range` with `Rational` endpoints and given a rational step size.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>