ruby-talk

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#113] Re: ruby 1.1d0 released — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Hi.

7 messages 1998/12/16

[#114] socket.so fails to load in ruby 1.1d0 — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1998/12/17

Hello,

[#115] STDIN integer assignment — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1998/12/17

Hello,

[#116] RE: STDIN integer assignment — ozawa@... 1998/12/17

In article <Pine.NEB.3.95.981216225135.16135C-100000@imaji.net>,

[#117] Re: STDIN integer assignment — WATANABE Hirofumi <watanabe@...> 1998/12/17

Julian Fondren <julian@imaji.net> writes:

[#118] Re: STDIN integer assignment — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1998/12/17

On 16 Dec, Julian Fondren wrote:

[#119] — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1998/12/17

Hi!

[#120] finished simple script — Julian Fondren <julian@...>

Greetings,

4 messages 1998/12/17

[#121] Re: finished simple script — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1998/12/18

Hi!

[#122] Re: finished simple script — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1998/12/18

> Hi!

[#123] Re: finished simple script — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1998/12/18

In message "[ruby-talk:00122] Re: finished simple script"

[#124] "Compiled" .rb's — "Bryce" <crowdog@...>

Yes, I am a newbie....

5 messages 1998/12/20

[#125] Binary distribution — Elan <icimjs@...> 1998/12/20

Hi,

[#130] Re: "Compiled" .rb's — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1998/12/20

Hi.

[#132] Re: "Compiled" .rb's — Elan <icimjs@...> 1998/12/20

At 12:54 AM 12/21/98 +0900, you wrote:

[#135] Re: "Compiled" .rb's — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1998/12/21

> At 12:54 AM 12/21/98 +0900, you wrote:

[#126] Re: Binary distribution — "Bryce" <crowdog@...>

Yes. Go here: ftp://ftp.tokyonet.ad.jp/pub/misc/ruby/pc/

1 message 1998/12/20

[#127] very very NEWbie — "Bryce" <crowdog@...>

Ok, I'm having trouble with an extremely simple class.

5 messages 1998/12/20

[#128] RE: very very NEWbie — OZAWA Sakuro <crouton@...> 1998/12/20

In article <004001be2bce$b9fee660$3d07fbd1@irule>,

[#129] Re: very very NEWbie — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1998/12/20

Hi.

[#133] Re: very very NEWbie — Reimer Behrends <behrends@...> 1998/12/20

On Mon, Dec 21, 1998 at 12:41:43AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#136] Re: very very NEWbie — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1998/12/21

Hi.

[#131] [Q]: English version of Ruby-Manual as printable version? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hello,

2 messages 1998/12/20

[#134] Re: [Q]: English version of Ruby-Manual as printable version? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1998/12/20

Hi Cle.

[#137] swig & ruby? — "Bryce" <crowdog@...>

has anyone created a swig (http://www.swig.org/) module for Ruby?

2 messages 1998/12/23

[#139] Re: swig & ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1998/12/23

Hi.

[#138] Thread Problems — Reimer Behrends <behrends@...>

I have been looking at the thread implementation of Ruby for the past

21 messages 1998/12/23

[#144] Re: Thread Problems — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1998/12/25

Hi.

[#164] Re: Thread Problems — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/01/05

Hi.

[#165] Makefiles and -lcurses — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1999/01/05

I want to compile the curses extension with -locurses rather than

[#166] Re: Makefiles and -lcurses — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/01/05

Hi.

[#167] Makefiles and -lcurses — Klaus.Schilling@... 1999/01/05

Julian Fondren writes:

[#168] Re: Makefiles and -lcurses — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1999/01/05

OpenBSD has ncurses and it's own ocurses, and I prefer the latter.

[#169] hah, check these errors — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1999/01/05

/usr/lib/libm.so.0.1: Undefined symbol `__GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_' referenced

[#170] Re: hah, check these errors — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/01/05

Hi.

[#171] another question about Makefiles — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1999/01/05

Hello,

[#172] Re: another question about Makefiles — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/01/05

Hi.

[#173] Re: another question about Makefiles — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1999/01/05

> |OK, I've narrowed down which extension doesn't like me - tcltklib - that

[#178] Re: another question about Makefiles — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/01/07

[#174] some more information — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1999/01/06

greetings,

[#175] Re: some more information — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/01/06

Hi.

[#179] Re: some more information — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/01/07

In message "[ruby-talk:00175] Re: some more information"

[#188] 1.2.1, compilation works fine — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1999/01/16

Hi!

[#189] Re: 1.2.1, compilation works fine — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/01/16

Hi.

[#190] Re: 1.2.1, compilation works fine — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1999/01/17

> Do you mean you've succeeded to compile ruby on OpenBSD?

[#191] defining self causes a segmentation fault — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1999/01/17

Hello,

[#196] Re: defining self causes a segmentation fault — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/01/18

Hi.

[#140] ruby 1.3 released — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Hi, all.

10 messages 1998/12/24

[#141] Re: ruby 1.3 released — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1998/12/24

On 24 Dec, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#142] Re: ruby 1.3 released — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1998/12/24

In message "[ruby-talk:00141] Re: ruby 1.3 released"

[#143] Re: ruby 1.3 released — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1998/12/25

Hi.

[#148] inability to load extension modules in 1.2, core dump — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1998/12/27

Ok.. 1.1d9 worked with no problems, and no significant or relevent changes

[#149] Re: inability to load extension modules in 1.2, c ore dump — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1998/12/27

On 27 Dec, Julian Fondren wrote:

[#152] Re: inability to load extension modules in 1.2, c ore dump — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1998/12/27

> Please perform a "ldd miniruby", "ldd ruby" and "ldd socket.so" in the

[#159] Re: inability to load extension modules in 1.2, c ore dump — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1998/12/29

On 27 Dec, Julian Fondren wrote:

[#157] Re: inability to load extension modules in 1.2, core dump — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1998/12/28

Hi.

[#158] Re: inability to load extension modules in 1.2, core dump — Julian Fondren <julian@...> 1998/12/29

I am running OpenBSD 2.4 on an i386. config.h is as follows..

[#145] Win32 callback into Ruby code? — "Bryce" <crowdog@...>

I have not seen this anywhere for Ruby but I was

2 messages 1998/12/26

[#151] Re: Win32 callback into Ruby code? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1998/12/27

Hi.

[#146] calling a Ruby function from C? — "Bryce" <crowdog@...>

What I am wanting to accomplish is like a callback.

3 messages 1998/12/26

[#147] Re: calling a Ruby function from C? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1998/12/26

Hi.

[#150] Re: calling a Ruby function from C? — shugo@... (Shugo Maeda) 1998/12/27

Hi, Bryce,

[#153] undefined method 'call'... help please — "Bryce" <crowdog@...>

Yes, it's me again. Mr. Newbie.

2 messages 1998/12/28

[#154] Re: undefined method 'call'... help please — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1998/12/28

Hi.

[#155] Re: undefined method 'call'... help please — "Bryce" <crowdog@...>

Here is my source for the "init" function:

2 messages 1998/12/28

[#156] Re: undefined method 'call'... help please — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1998/12/28

まつもとゆきひろです

[#160] Happy new year! — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hello folks,

4 messages 1998/12/31

[#161] Re: Happy new year! — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/01/01

Greetings!

[#162] Re: Happy new year! — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/01/01

Hi.

[#163] Re: Happy new year! — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/01/01

=begin

[ruby-talk:00143] Re: ruby 1.3 released

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Date: 1998-12-25 01:12:56 UTC

List: ruby-talk #143

Hi.

In message "[ruby-talk:00141] Re: ruby 1.3 released"
    on 98/12/24, Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net> writes:

|>   1.2 = stable version (will be released tommorrow)
|>   1.3 = experimental version
|
|Sorry, but I don't understand that scheme. First there was a 1.1d0.
|After that 1.1d1 (inofficial) was released. And at last but not least
|there is an 1.3 which follows directly 1.1d1. So that would give that
|figure: 1.1c9 --> 1.1d0 --> 1.1d1 --> 1.3. 
|
|How does the 1.2 fit into that scheme????????

Oh, I forgot to mention that stable version 1.2, which is a sucessor
to 1.1c will be out soon, maybe today (25th).

|Thank you for inventing such a great language. It's fun to work with!!!

You're welcome.
                                                        matz.

Thread

In This Thread