[#192] auto-loaded script? — Julian Fondren <julian@...>
Does ruby load any particular scripts upon startup?
13 messages
1999/01/17
[#193] Re: auto-loaded script?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/01/17
In message "[ruby-talk:00192] auto-loaded script?"
[#194] Re: auto-loaded script?
— Julian Fondren <julian@...>
1999/01/18
> >Does ruby load any particular scripts upon startup?
[#195] Re: auto-loaded script?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/01/18
Hi.
[#197] Re: auto-loaded script?
— Julian Fondren <julian@...>
1999/01/18
> rb_load_file("/home/julian/.rubyrc"); /* this line added */
[#210] Get character with no wait — Gabriel <gabriel@...>
What is the best way to do a getc without waiting; so I can try to grab
8 messages
1999/01/25
[ruby-talk:00173] Re: another question about Makefiles
From:
Julian Fondren <julian@...>
Date:
1999-01-05 11:18:01 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #173
> |OK, I've narrowed down which extension doesn't like me - tcltklib - that > |is, ruby can be compiled with every extension but it. What I want to do is > |use the flag -tcl80 rather than -tcl in ext/tcltklib/Makefile but > |something in extconf.rb overwrites this and I am not precisely sure what. > > Well, maybe I made mistake in extconf.rb. It should choose tcl8.0 (or > later) if it can find. I'd check about it. It gets everything else correct, where the libs are, where the includes are, etc - the Makefile is otherwise fine except that it wants -tcl instead of -ltcl80, which after a few tests doesn't seem to matter. In fact.. as far as I can tell everything is just fine except that when tcltklib is included as an extension I get that strange error with a static compilation. Also, ext/tcltklib/lib/tcltk.rb is almost entirely written in japanese, while nearly all other .rb files are not - indeed the only other one which has tcltk.rb's level of japanese characters is one of tcltklib's samples ;-) though, ruby doesn't appear to have any problem parsing it. On the lighter side: I can use ruby again ;-) .. just not the tk end of it, sadly. thanks,