[#113] Re: ruby 1.1d0 released — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Hi.
7 messages
1998/12/16
[#127] very very NEWbie — "Bryce" <crowdog@...>
Ok, I'm having trouble with an extremely simple class.
5 messages
1998/12/20
[#138] Thread Problems — Reimer Behrends <behrends@...>
I have been looking at the thread implementation of Ruby for the past
21 messages
1998/12/23
[#164] Re: Thread Problems
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/01/05
Hi.
[#167] Makefiles and -lcurses
— Klaus.Schilling@...
1999/01/05
Julian Fondren writes:
[#168] Re: Makefiles and -lcurses
— Julian Fondren <julian@...>
1999/01/05
OpenBSD has ncurses and it's own ocurses, and I prefer the latter.
[#169] hah, check these errors
— Julian Fondren <julian@...>
1999/01/05
/usr/lib/libm.so.0.1: Undefined symbol `__GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_' referenced
[#170] Re: hah, check these errors
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/01/05
Hi.
[#171] another question about Makefiles
— Julian Fondren <julian@...>
1999/01/05
Hello,
[#172] Re: another question about Makefiles
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/01/05
Hi.
[#174] some more information
— Julian Fondren <julian@...>
1999/01/06
greetings,
[#175] Re: some more information
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/01/06
Hi.
[#179] Re: some more information
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/01/07
In message "[ruby-talk:00175] Re: some more information"
[#140] ruby 1.3 released — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Hi, all.
10 messages
1998/12/24
[#141] Re: ruby 1.3 released
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1998/12/24
On 24 Dec, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#143] Re: ruby 1.3 released
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1998/12/25
Hi.
[#148] inability to load extension modules in 1.2, core dump
— Julian Fondren <julian@...>
1998/12/27
Ok.. 1.1d9 worked with no problems, and no significant or relevent changes
[#149] Re: inability to load extension modules in 1.2, c ore dump
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1998/12/27
On 27 Dec, Julian Fondren wrote:
[ruby-talk:00141] Re: ruby 1.3 released
From:
Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Date:
1998-12-24 16:23:51 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #141
On 24 Dec, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > Hi, all. > Hi, > I have released experimental version 1.3, which comes next to > unannounced version 1.1d1 > ??????? > ftp://ftp.netlab.co.jp/pub/lang/ruby/ruby-1.3.tar.gz > > I changed versioning scheme. > Why, if I may ask? Is that scheme only changed for that releases, or in future also? What would indicate a beta version (odd digits?)? > 1.2 = stable version (will be released tommorrow) > 1.3 = experimental version > Sorry, but I don't understand that scheme. First there was a 1.1d0. After that 1.1d1 (inofficial) was released. And at last but not least there is an 1.3 which follows directly 1.1d1. So that would give that figure: 1.1c9 --> 1.1d0 --> 1.1d1 --> 1.3. How does the 1.2 fit into that scheme???????? > I fixed severabl bugs in 1.3 from 1.1d0. > Enjoy! well, at you own risk. ;-) > I will have fun, of course! ;-))) > Merry Christmas, You too, and thanx for that pretty surprise. :-)) > matz. > p.s. > To Clemens. > Finally we can invoke method thru `foo::bar' even without argument. > Thank you for inspiring me. Thank you for inventing such a great language. It's fun to work with!!! Cle.