ruby-talk

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#954] Re: Curios About "ruby"? — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

1 message 1999/12/06

[#955] Ruby 1.4.3 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Ruby 1.4.3 is out, check out:

1 message 1999/12/07

[#956] Ruby 1.4.3 repacked — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Ruby 1.4.3 is out, check out:

1 message 1999/12/08

[#957] ruby-mode — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...>

hi all,

2 messages 1999/12/08

[#958] Re: ruby-mode — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 1999/12/08

From: Yasushi Shoji <yashi@yashi.com>

[#959] FYI: DRAFT of comp.lang.ruby RFD (request for discussion) — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

This is still in the preliminary stages, but I thought people might be

1 message 1999/12/09

[#960] [ANNOUNCE: Ruby Who's Who] e-mail address — Tomoyuki Kosimizu <greentea@...2.so-net.ne.jp>

Hi,

1 message 1999/12/09

[#961] Ruby compileable by C++ compiler? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

8 messages 1999/12/10

[#962] Re: Ruby compileable by C++ compiler? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/10

Hi,

[#963] Re: Ruby compileable by C++ compiler? — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 1999/12/10

Wei,

[#965] Re: Ruby compileable by C++ compiler? — kjana@... (YANAGAWA Kazuhisa) 1999/12/10

In message <14416.49702.585411.416016@gargle.gargle.HOWL>

[#968] Re: Ruby compileable by C++ compiler? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/10

Hi,

[#970] Re: Ruby compileable by C++ compiler? — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 1999/12/10

Hi,

[#981] Re: Ruby compileable by C++ compiler? — kjana@... (YANAGAWA Kazuhisa) 1999/12/12

In message <14417.10061.869216.572571@gargle.gargle.HOWL>

[#980] Re: Ruby compileable by C++ compiler? — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 1999/12/11

> In message "[ruby-talk:00965] Re: Ruby compileable by C++ compiler?"

[#964] Bastion or SecurityManager for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...>

Hi,

15 messages 1999/12/10

[#978] Re: Translating Ruby books and documentation to English — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 1999/12/11

(NOTE: changed "Subject:" from "Re: [ruby-talk:00974] Re: Bastion or

[#983] Re: Translating Ruby books and documentation to English — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/13

Hi,

[#966] Re: Bastion or SecurityManager for Ruby? — nakajima kengo<ringo@...> 1999/12/10

Hello Clemens,

[#971] Re: Bastion or SecurityManager for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 1999/12/10

Hallo Kengo,

[#974] Re: Bastion or SecurityManager for Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/10

[#976] Re: Bastion or SecurityManager for Ruby? — Wakou Aoyama <wakou@...> 1999/12/10

On Sat, 11 Dec 1999 03:13:00 +0900,

[#967] Re: Bastion or SecurityManager for Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/10

Hi,

[#969] Re: Bastion or SecurityManager for Ruby? — nakajima kengo<ringo@...> 1999/12/10

Hi, soon again from me, but please don't feel being annoyed.

[#973] Re: Bastion or SecurityManager for Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/10

Hi,

[#977] Re: Bastion or SecurityManager for Ruby? — nakajima kengo<ringo@...> 1999/12/11

[#972] Re: Bastion or SecurityManager for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 1999/12/10

Hi,

[#979] Can a "daily digest" mailing list of all ruby-talk messages be set up? — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 1999/12/11

Would it be possible to set up a ruby-talk digest mailing list that works

[#982] Re: Can a "daily digest" mailing list of all ruby-talk messages be set up? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/13

Hi,

[#997] Re: Translating Ruby books and documentation to English — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 1999/12/19

[#975] Glade/Ruby 0.6.1 and 0.7.0 — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...>

hi all,

1 message 1999/12/10

[#984] -T2 and require — ts <decoux@...>

4 messages 1999/12/16

[#985] Re: -T2 and require — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/17

[#987] Re: -T2 and require — ts <decoux@...> 1999/12/18

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp> writes:

[#988] Re: -T2 and require — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/18

Hi,

[#986] RAA — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...>

hi,

1 message 1999/12/18

[#989] a question about to_i — Friedrich Dominicus <Friedrich.Dominicus@...>

Sorry, I'm quite new to ruby. But I encounterd the following problem. If

17 messages 1999/12/19

[#1002] Re: a question about to_i — Friedrich Dominicus <Friedrich.Dominicus@...> 1999/12/20

some solutions ommitted.

[#1003] Re: a question about to_i — Friedrich Dominicus <Friedrich.Dominicus@...> 1999/12/20

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#1004] Re: a question about to_i — Friedrich Dominicus <Friedrich.Dominicus@...> 1999/12/20

GOTO Kentaro wrote:

[#990] Re: a question about to_i — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 1999/12/19

From: Friedrich Dominicus <Friedrich.Dominicus@inka.de>

[#991] Re: a question about to_i — Friedrich Dominicus <Friedrich.Dominicus@...> 1999/12/19

Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#993] Re: a question about to_i — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 1999/12/19

From: Friedrich Dominicus <Friedrich.Dominicus@inka.de>

[#1023] Re: a question about to_i — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/01/02

From note of Clemens Hintze:

[#992] Re: a question about to_i — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/12/19

Hi,

[#994] Re: a question about to_i — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/12/19

In message "[ruby-talk:00992] Re: a question about to_i"

[#995] Re: a question about to_i — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/12/19

In message "[ruby-talk:00992] Re: a question about to_i"

[#996] Re: a question about to_i — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/19

Hi,

[#998] Re: a question about to_i — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 1999/12/19

----- Original Message -----

[#1007] Re: a question about to_i — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/29

Hi,

[#1015] Re: a question about to_i — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/12/31

Hi,

[#1022] Re: a question about to_i — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/31

Hi,

[#999] Re: a question about to_i — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 1999/12/19

[#1000] object-creation — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>

Hello...

2 messages 1999/12/19

[#1001] Re: object-creation — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/20

Hi,

[#1005] A Christmas present from Nagano, Japan. — SuHi <manamist@...>

Hi all,

1 message 1999/12/24

[#1006] net/* 1.1.3 — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>

Hi,

1 message 1999/12/29

[#1008] Blocks, Procs, and iterators — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

4 messages 1999/12/31

[#1012] Re: Blocks, Procs, and iterators — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/31

[#1014] Blocks, Procs, and iterators — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/12/31

Hi,

[#1017] Re: Blocks, Procs, and iterators — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/31

Happy new year.

[#1009] Reparenting a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

7 messages 1999/12/31

[#1010] Re: Reparenting a block — Masaki Fukushima <fukusima@...> 1999/12/31

Hi,

[#1011] Re: Reparenting a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 1999/12/31

Masaki Fukushima <fukusima@goto.info.waseda.ac.jp> writes:

[#1013] Re: Reparenting a block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/31

[#1016] Re: Reparenting a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 1999/12/31

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#1018] Re: Reparenting a block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/12/31

In message "[ruby-talk:01016] Re: Reparenting a block"

[#1019] Re: Reparenting a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 1999/12/31

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#1020] Is there a standard graphic/icon? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

2 messages 1999/12/31

[#1021] Re: Is there a standard graphic/icon? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 1999/12/31

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>

[ruby-talk:01011] Re: Reparenting a block

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

Date: 1999-12-31 08:08:06 UTC

List: ruby-talk #1011

Masaki Fukushima <fukusima@goto.info.waseda.ac.jp> writes:

> > the object created by Dave.new? I've tried instance_eval, but I don't
> > seem to be able to get it so work with a variable containing a block.
> 
> Following seems to work as you want.
> 
>        def initialize(&block)
>           instance_eval(&block)
>        end

Indeed it does! I misunderstood instance_eval, and thought you should
pass the block to it, not make the proc instance_eval's own block.

Many thanks

Dave

Thread

In This Thread