From: matz@... Date: 2019-11-27T13:55:06+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:95982] [Ruby master Feature#16370] Pattern matching with variable assignment (the priority of `in` operator) Issue #16370 has been updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto). We have discussed about in-line pattern matching and made a decision that it should cause an exception instead of returning false. So this issue will disappear. We might need to talk about the precedence for e.g. `a = n in 99 rescue nil`. Matz. ---------------------------------------- Feature #16370: Pattern matching with variable assignment (the priority of `in` operator) https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16370#change-82815 * Author: jnchito (Junichi Ito) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: ---------------------------------------- I wrote this code: ``` ruby n = 0 ret = n in 99 p ret ``` I expected `ret` was `false` but was `0` (truthy value). I had to write like this: ```ruby n = 0 ret = (n in 99) p ret #=> false ``` However, I would like to write `ret = n in 99` because it is more natural for me, and I am afraid many people might mistake like me. Could you reconsider the priority of `in` operator? -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: