From: manga.osyo@... Date: 2019-11-13T15:31:42+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:95844] [Ruby master Bug#16340] There are cases where `eval("_ 1")` does not refer to Numbered parameter Issue #16340 has been updated by osyo (manga osyo). @Eregon Thanks comment! > Do you have any realistic use case where you would want your expected behavior? No. However, I thought it was strange behavior and reported. I agree to reject. ---------------------------------------- Bug #16340: There are cases where `eval("_ 1")` does not refer to Numbered parameter https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16340#change-82677 * Author: osyo (manga osyo) * Status: Rejected * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.7.0dev (2019-11-11T10:03:43Z trunk 9d3213ac85) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ## Steps to reproduce 1. Define local variable `_1` outside block 2. Call Numbered parameter in block 3. Call `eval("_1")` in same block ## Expected behavior ```ruby _1 = :local_variable proc { _1 # return Numbered parameter(_1) eval("_1") # => :argument }.call :argument ``` ## Actual behavior ```ruby _1 = :local_variable proc { _1 # return local variables outside block eval("_1") # => :local_variable }.call :argument ``` This is strange behavior because I want to expect to reference `_1` in block. ## Note * Return Numbered parameter if not define local variables outside block ```ruby # _1 = :local_variable proc { _1 # Actual behavior # return Numbered parameter eval("_1") # => :argument }.call :argument ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: