From: zverok.offline@... Date: 2019-11-20T20:11:29+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:95900] [Ruby master Feature#16356] Method#inspect of argument forwarding Issue #16356 has been updated by zverok (Victor Shepelev). `#inspect` just follows whatever `#parameters` say. But I indeed find that `#parameters` return value is kinda weird for this case: ``` ./ruby --disable-gems -e "def m(...); end; p method(:m).parameters" [[:rest, :*], [:block, :&]] ``` E.g., literally, "parameter of the *type* `:rest`, *named* `*`, and parameter of the *type* `:block`, *named* `&`". I believe that a proper return value for parameters in this case would be, probably ```ruby [[:rest], [:keyrest], [:block]] ``` If it would be so (and it seems reasonable), `#inspect` will return `#m(*, **, &)` ---------------------------------------- Feature #16356: Method#inspect of argument forwarding https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16356#change-82742 * Author: znz (Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: ---------------------------------------- Current behavior includes `(**, &&)`. Is this intentional? ``` % ruby -e 'def mf(...);end;p method(:mf)' # ``` I added tests of current behavior at https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/777973084e599cf9efa490173709b187fb507f90 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: