From: shyouhei@... Date: 2016-12-21T14:22:31+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:78779] [Ruby trunk Feature#12861] super in a block can be either lexically or dynamically scoped depending on how the block is invoked Issue #12861 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe. We looked at this issue at today's developer meeting. I think attendees had an assumption that changing behavour of `super` is too drastic. This feature (if added) should be called something new. So there are rooms for dynamic_super. For lexical one, I like the idea. But Matz was wondering if such lexically-scoped super would actually get used. ---------------------------------------- Feature #12861: super in a block can be either lexically or dynamically scoped depending on how the block is invoked https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12861#change-62181 * Author: bug hit * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto * Target version: ---------------------------------------- ```ruby class Class1 def self.foo 'foo' end def self.method1 'method1' end end class Class2 < Class1 def self.foo bar do super() end end def self.bar(&block) a = block.() define_singleton_method :method1, &block b = send(:method1) c = block.() [a, b, c] end end p Class2.foo # ["foo", "method1", "foo"] ``` It doesn't seem like a good idea for a given language construct to be either lexically or dynamically scoped, depending on how its surrounding block is invoked (which is not visible at the point of definition). I think it would be better if super were always lexically scoped, and a different keyword (dynamic_super) were always dynamically scoped -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: