[#78633] ruby/spec needs help from CRuby committers — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
Currently, ruby/spec is maintained mostly by individuals and enjoys the
13 messages
2016/12/13
[#78963] Re: ruby/spec needs help from CRuby committers
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2017/01/04
I did ask attendees of last developer meeting to join this
[#78642] Re: ruby/spec needs help from CRuby committers
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2016/12/14
Benoit Daloze <eregontp@gmail.com> wrote:
[ruby-core:78573] [Ruby trunk Feature#12161][Closed] Friendly BigDecimal#inspect
From:
muraken@...
Date:
2016-12-10 07:14:14 UTC
List:
ruby-core #78573
Issue #12161 has been updated by Kenta Murata. Status changed from Assigned to Closed This is fixed in the latest master branch of [ruby/bigdecimal](https://github.com/ruby/bigdecimal). ---------------------------------------- Feature #12161: Friendly BigDecimal#inspect https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12161#change-61958 * Author: Max Melentiev * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Kenta Murata ---------------------------------------- Can BigDecimal's #inspect be more human-friendly? Even just `#<BigDecimal:b7ea1130,1234.5678,8(12)>` instead of `#<BigDecimal:b7ea1130,'0.12345678E4',8(12)>` will be much easy to read. But I think the best option is `1234.5678(#<BigDecimal:b7ea1130,8(12)>)` or something alike, which focuses on its numeric nature. I've never used bigdecimal's address and number of significant digits. Maybe if this is rarely used information it can be avoided in #inspect at all. With such formatting It'll be easier to recognise values in repl, debugger, and especially in test's output/failures. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>