[ruby-core:78229] [Ruby trunk Feature#12957] A more OO way to create lambda Procs
From:
shyouhei@...
Date:
2016-11-20 13:38:28 UTC
List:
ruby-core #78229
Issue #12957 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
Problem is, when you allow LambdaProc.new, that have to accept non-lambda procs, like LambdaProc.new(&nonlambda). This way, a proc would be converted from/between lambda and non-lambda.
This is not a good idea. Right now a lambda is born to be a lambda and there is no way to turn it into a proc. If such property breaks, a programmer cannot guarantee what to expect to a block they wrote's parameter, because that proc can later be changed into a lambda by someone else. And there is no way to detect such change from that block itself before it is called.
----------------------------------------
Feature #12957: A more OO way to create lambda Procs
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12957#change-61594
* Author: Colin Fulton
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
----------------------------------------
Currently to create a lambda Proc one has to use `lambda { }` or `-> { }`. For doing metaprogramming it would be nice to have a more OO way to generate them. Something like `LambdaProc.new`. That way one could write:
```ruby
class MetaThingy
def initialize proc_class
@anonymous_function = proc_class.new do
# Some Code
end
end
end
```
and pass in either `Proc` or `LambdaProc` depending on their needs, instead of:
```ruby
class MetaThingy
def initialize proc_type
@anonymous_function = case proc_type
when :proc
proc do
# Some Code
end
when :lambda
lambda do
# Some Code
end
end
end
end
end
```
This is not a common use case, but would help make the language more orthogonal.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>