[#73707] [Ruby trunk Misc#12004] Code of Conduct — hanmac@...
Issue #12004 has been updated by Hans Mackowiak.
3 messages
2016/02/05
[#73730] [Ruby trunk Feature#12034] RegExp does not respect file encoding directive — nobu@...
Issue #12034 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2016/02/07
[#73746] [Ruby trunk Feature#12034] RegExp does not respect file encoding directive — nobu@...
Issue #12034 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2016/02/09
[#73919] [Ruby trunk Feature#11262] Make more objects behave like "Functions" — Ruby-Lang@...
Issue #11262 has been updated by J旦rg W Mittag.
3 messages
2016/02/22
[#74019] [Ruby trunk Bug#12103][Rejected] ruby process hangs while executing regular expression. — duerst@...
Issue #12103 has been updated by Martin D端rst.
3 messages
2016/02/27
[ruby-core:73857] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12075] some container#nonempty?
From:
Matthew Kerwin <matthew@...>
Date:
2016-02-16 22:12:08 UTC
List:
ruby-core #73857
On 17/02/2016 3:31 AM, <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote: > > Issue #12075 has been updated by Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas. > > > The implementation doesn't have to be the same as the one implemented by ActiveSupport. I think it would be fine to simply check for nil? and empty?. But I'd like to keep the names present? and blank? anyway. > I'm sure the rails community would love methods with identical names but different behaviours to suddenly appear in the core. Personally I don't have a problem with 'nonempty?', since that's the trinary complement of 'empty' and 'full'. Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>