[#73707] [Ruby trunk Misc#12004] Code of Conduct — hanmac@...
Issue #12004 has been updated by Hans Mackowiak.
3 messages
2016/02/05
[#73730] [Ruby trunk Feature#12034] RegExp does not respect file encoding directive — nobu@...
Issue #12034 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2016/02/07
[#73746] [Ruby trunk Feature#12034] RegExp does not respect file encoding directive — nobu@...
Issue #12034 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2016/02/09
[#73919] [Ruby trunk Feature#11262] Make more objects behave like "Functions" — Ruby-Lang@...
Issue #11262 has been updated by J旦rg W Mittag.
3 messages
2016/02/22
[#74019] [Ruby trunk Bug#12103][Rejected] ruby process hangs while executing regular expression. — duerst@...
Issue #12103 has been updated by Martin D端rst.
3 messages
2016/02/27
[ruby-core:73772] Re: [Ruby trunk Misc#12004] Code of Conduct
From:
benjamin barber <starworks5@...>
Date:
2016-02-11 10:37:42 UTC
List:
ruby-core #73772
The Code of Conducts basically amount to a "code of wrongthink". This can be best described when some of their advocates, like for example in the Node project make respositories called "mansplain" and "misandry", or when speakers at OSCON are caught with mugs reading "male tears" and using the "#killallmen" hashtag, and are ironically ignored when you report these matters whatsoever. More importantly many in the industry have taken af "extend, embrace, extinguish" mentality to open source, projects that have been initially open source have become monetized and controlled by organizations, which have no intention of allowing open governance or control over the code base, and use these sort of "code of conducts" to label dissenting opinions as "toxic" or heretical. I'd also like to mention that blacklisting is generally considered illegal, and I consider the application of sanctioned discrimination, even politically correct forms of it as illegal as well. "The *Hollywood blacklist*—as the broader *entertainment industry blacklist* is generally known—was the practice of denying employment to screenwriters, actors, directors, musicians, and other American entertainment professionals during the mid-20th century because of their suspected Communist sympathy or membership in the Communist Party." "John Henry Faulk won his lawsuit in 1962. With this court decision, the private blacklisters and those who used them were put on notice that they were legally liable <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_liability> for the professional and financial damage they caused. This helped to bring an end to publications such as *Counterattack"* On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:24 AM, <chris@metatrontech.com> wrote: > Issue #12004 has been updated by Chris Travers. > > > Tomek Mańko wrote: > > > > This is not a rational discussion most of the time, but a lukewarm war > of sorts. > > And that is what must be avoided at all costs in my view in an > international project. > > They call it a culture war for a reason. And in a global project, that is > a very dangerous thing > > ---------------------------------------- > Misc #12004: Code of Conduct > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12004#change-56956 > > * Author: Coraline Ada Ehmke > * Status: Assigned > * Priority: Normal > * Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto > ---------------------------------------- > I am the creator of the Contributor Covenant, a code of conduct for Open > Source projects. At last count there are over 13,000 projects on Github > that have adopted it. This past year saw adoption of Contributor Covenant > by a lot of very large, very visible projects, including Rails, Github's > Atom text editor, Angular JS, bundler, curl, diaspora, discourse, Eclipse, > rspec, shoes, and rvm. The bundler team made code of conduct integration an > option in the gem creation workflow, putting it on par with license > selection. Many open source language communities have already adopted the > code of conduct, including Elixir, Mono, the .NET foundation, F#, and > Apple's Swift. RubyTogether also adopted a policy to only fund Ruby > projects that had a solid code of conduct in place. > > Right now in the PHP community there is a healthy debate about adopting > the Contributor Covenant. Since it came from and has been so widely adopted > by the Ruby community at large, I think it's time that we consider adopting > it for the core Ruby language as well. > > Our community prides itself on niceness. What a code of conduct does is > define what we mean by nice. It states clearly that we value openness, > courtesy, and compassion. That we care about and want contributions from > people who may be different from us. That we pledge to respect all > contributors regardless of their race, gender, sexual orientation, or other > factors. And it makes it clear that we are prepared to follow through on > these values with action when and if an incident arises. > > I'm asking that we join with the larger Ruby community in supporting the > adoption of the Contributor Covenant for the Ruby language. I think that > this will be an important step forward and will ensure the continued > welcoming and supportive environment around Ruby. You can read the full > text of the Contributor Covenant at > http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/3/0/ and learn more at > http://contributor-covenant.org/. > > Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to hearing your thoughts. > > > ---Files-------------------------------- > Screen Shot 2016-01-22 at 6.45.23 PM.png (595 KB) > Ruby_Code_of_Conduct_Numbers.png (119 KB) > Ruby_Code_of_Conduct_Discussion.png (143 KB) > > > -- > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ > > Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> > <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core> > Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>