[#73707] [Ruby trunk Misc#12004] Code of Conduct — hanmac@...
Issue #12004 has been updated by Hans Mackowiak.
3 messages
2016/02/05
[#73730] [Ruby trunk Feature#12034] RegExp does not respect file encoding directive — nobu@...
Issue #12034 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2016/02/07
[#73746] [Ruby trunk Feature#12034] RegExp does not respect file encoding directive — nobu@...
Issue #12034 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2016/02/09
[#73919] [Ruby trunk Feature#11262] Make more objects behave like "Functions" — Ruby-Lang@...
Issue #11262 has been updated by J旦rg W Mittag.
3 messages
2016/02/22
[#74019] [Ruby trunk Bug#12103][Rejected] ruby process hangs while executing regular expression. — duerst@...
Issue #12103 has been updated by Martin D端rst.
3 messages
2016/02/27
[ruby-core:73636] [Ruby trunk Feature#11868]Proposal for RubyVM::InstructionSequence.compile to return an object containing the syntax error information currently written to STDERR
From:
jrafanie@...
Date:
2016-02-01 21:28:45 UTC
List:
ruby-core #73636
Issue #11868 has been updated by Joe Rafaniello.
Hi @nobu, thanks for working on this feature in https://github.com/ruby/ruby/compare/trunk...nobu:feature/11868-SyntaxError-location.
For this example:
~~~~
RubyVM::InstructionSequence.new("puts 'hi'\n puts 'hi2'\n\nthis.is -> not -> valid $ruby:syntax")
<compiled>:4: syntax error, unexpected keyword_not, expecting keyword_do_LAMBDA or tLAMBEG
this.is -> not -> valid $ruby:syntax
^
<compiled>:4: syntax error, unexpected tGVAR, expecting keyword_do_LAMBDA or tLAMBEG
this.is -> not -> valid $ruby:syntax
^
SyntaxError: compile error
from (irb):11:in `new'
from (irb):11
from /Users/joerafaniello/.rubies/ruby-2.2.4/bin/irb:11:in `<main>'
~~~~
Using your branch on github, we would get the file: 'compiled' and lineno: '4' but not the message(or hint) with the "^" indicating where the syntax error occurred.
Is it possible to get the file, lineno and message(or hint)?
This is the type of code we are trying to eliminate: (shelling out to ruby and capturing $stderr):
https://github.com/bbatsov/rubocop/blob/86e1acf67794bf6dd5d65812b91df475e44fa320/spec/support/mri_syntax_checker.rb#L51-L63
Thanks again for looking into this feature!
Joe
----------------------------------------
Feature #11868: Proposal for RubyVM::InstructionSequence.compile to return an object containing the syntax error information currently written to STDERR
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11868#change-56828
* Author: Joe Rafaniello
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
----------------------------------------
Currently, RubyVM::InstructionSequence.compile or RubyVM::InstructionSequence.new return a new InstructionSequence for valid ruby.
For invalid syntax, a SyntaxError is raised with a message of 'compile error'. Meanwhile, the useful information, line number(s) and hint(s) to the invalid syntax location, is printed on standard error. I am proposing this information be returned as an object in the event of a SyntaxError.
For example, here's good syntax:
~~~
RubyVM::InstructionSequence.new("x =1")
# => <RubyVM::InstructionSequence:<compiled>@<compiled>>
~~~
Here's bad syntax:
~~~
RubyVM::InstructionSequence.new("puts 'hi'\n puts 'hi2'\n\nthis.is -> not -> valid $ruby:syntax")
# => SyntaxError: compile error
# The useful hint and line number(s) are on standard error:
<compiled>:4: syntax error, unexpected keyword_not, expecting keyword_do_LAMBDA or tLAMBEG
this.is -> not -> valid $ruby:syntax
^
<compiled>:4: syntax error, unexpected tGVAR, expecting keyword_do_LAMBDA or tLAMBEG
this.is -> not -> valid $ruby:syntax
^
~~~
Some ideas:
1. Add methods to all SyntaxError exceptions to get all parse failures. For example: `syntax_error.parse_failures.each {|f| puts f.lineno; puts f.hint }`. In the above example, it failed on line 4 twice and we see two "hints."
2. Create a new method to RubyVM::InstructionSequence to check ruby syntax that would allow us to see if the syntax is valid and if not, the lineno and 'hint' for each parse failure.
Use case: Rubocop[a] and other utilities[b] are really complicated and check for valid ruby syntax by creating a process to run ruby -wc with the script.
[a] https://github.com/bbatsov/rubocop/blob/86e1acf67794bf6dd5d65812b91df475e44fa320/spec/support/mri_syntax_checker.rb#L51-L63
[b] https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/blob/6725fe52222c07d576a18126d2ff825ddc6dffd0/gems/pending/util/miq-syntax-checker.rb#L8-L13
It would be nice to remove all of this complexity and use RubyVM::InstructionSequence, which already has the information we need but in a more user friendly format.
Thanks!
Joe Rafaniello
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>