[#64210] Asking for clarification for exception handling usage — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
I've created a ticket for that but didn't get any feedback so I decided
5 messages
2014/08/05
[#64517] Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project — Tetsuya Kitahata <kitahata@99.alumni.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
What do you think? >> Ruby developers
13 messages
2014/08/23
[#64524] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Henry Maddocks <hmaddocks@...>
2014/08/24
[#64525] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Brandon Weaver <keystonelemur@...>
2014/08/24
What benefits are there to this? I have a feeling that adding unnecessary
[#64526] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Tetsuya Kitahata <kitahata@99.alumni.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
2014/08/24
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:43:46 -0700
[#64527] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/08/24
Here I am a Japanese. Before moving anywhere else answer to our question first: what benefits?
[#64528] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Tetsuya Kitahata <kitahata@99.alumni.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
2014/08/24
tax issue with each other.
[#64531] Re: Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/08/24
Forgot to assert my opinions:
[#64614] cowspace (work-in-progress) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hi all, I started working on a cowspace branch. Based on the mspace API
4 messages
2014/08/28
[#64615] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat() — oss-ruby-lang@...
Issue #10181 has been reported by Technorama Ltd..
10 messages
2014/08/28
[#64616] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/28
I like this feature.
[#64623] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...>
2014/08/29
On 08/28/2014 02:53 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
[#64634] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/29
Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@gmail.com> wrote:
[#64635] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...>
2014/08/29
On 08/29/2014 12:55 AM, Eric Wong wrote:
[#64638] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat()
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/29
Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@gmail.com> wrote:
[#64627] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10182] [PATCH] string.c: move frozen_strings table to rb_vm_t — ko1@...
Issue #10182 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
3 messages
2014/08/29
[#64671] Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Why this fix solve your problem?
9 messages
2014/08/30
[#64672] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/08/30
(2014/08/30 8:50), SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#64676] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/30
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#64684] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/08/31
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#64692] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/08/31
(2014/08/31 0:18), Eric Wong wrote:
[ruby-core:64668] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10188] [Open] Regression of Benchmark.realtime
From:
Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date:
2014-08-30 06:34:28 UTC
List:
ruby-core #64668
shibata.hiroshi@gmail.com wrote:
> I investigate this on Amazon Linux 2014.3
Is this shared machine/VM? What kernel config/version?
Kernel config may be in /proc/config.* , otherwise distros may put
kernel config in /boot/config*
I'm mainly interested in *_HZ and preempt options.
> https://gist.github.com/hsbt/2647af71d60121034c1c
>
> In this results, ```Benchmark.realtime { sleep 0.001 }``` returns 0.01 every 10 times.
Yikes, wild timings :<
> > Eric Wong
>
> How about do you think this fail?
I think the test case is too fragile. We should increase delta+sleep or
remove test. Based on comments on thread_pthread.c, 0.1s might be a
lower bound on portable timing granularity.
I think this can fail on your system even with the lib/benchmark.rb
optimization in r47260 reverted.