[#30995] [Bug #3523] win32 exception c0000029 on exit using fibers — B Kelly <redmine@...>

Bug #3523: win32 exception c0000029 on exit using fibers

19 messages 2010/07/02

[#31100] [rubysoc] Queue C-extension patch to come — Ricardo Panaggio <panaggio.ricardo@...>

Hello,

26 messages 2010/07/07
[#31148] Re: [rubysoc] Queue C-extension patch to come — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/07/09

> As this it my first patch to Ruby, I don't know where to begin with.

[#31320] Re: [rubysoc] Queue C-extension patch to come — Ricardo Panaggio <panaggio.ricardo@...> 2010/07/16

Sorry for leaving this thread for so long. I've tried to finish the

[#31322] Re: [rubysoc] Queue C-extension patch to come — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/07/16

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 06:55:35AM +0900, Ricardo Panaggio wrote:

[#31324] Re: [rubysoc] Queue C-extension patch to come — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/07/17

NB: I am Ricardo's mentor for this project.

[#31331] Re: [rubysoc] Queue C-extension patch to come — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/07/17

On 17 July 2010 06:00, Caleb Clausen <vikkous@gmail.com> wrote:

[#31332] Re: [rubysoc] Queue C-extension patch to come — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/07/17

On 7/17/10, Benoit Daloze <eregontp@gmail.com> wrote:

[#31138] Why is there no standard way of creating a String from a char *? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

Hi!

14 messages 2010/07/08
[#31146] Re: Why is there no standard way of creating a String from a char *? — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2010/07/09

(2010/07/09 7:04), Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#31149] Re: Why is there no standard way of creating a String from a char *? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2010/07/09

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 06:20, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#31150] Re: Why is there no standard way of creating a String from a char *? — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2010/07/09

(2010/07/09 18:28), Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#31217] [Bug #3562] regression in respond_to? — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #3562: regression in respond_to?

14 messages 2010/07/12

[#31269] [Bug #3566] memory leak when spawning+joining Threads in a loop — Eric Wong <redmine@...>

Bug #3566: memory leak when spawning+joining Threads in a loop

14 messages 2010/07/13

[#31399] [Backport #3595] Theres no encoding to differentiate a stream of Binary data from an 8-Bit ASCII string — Dreamcat Four <redmine@...>

Backport #3595: Theres no encoding to differentiate a stream of Binary data from an 8-Bit ASCII string

17 messages 2010/07/21

[#31459] [Bug #3607] [trunk/r28731] Gem.path has disappeared? — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...>

Bug #3607: [trunk/r28731] Gem.path has disappeared?

22 messages 2010/07/23

[#31519] [Bug #3622] Net::HTTP does not wait to send request body with Expect: 100-continue — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Bug #3622: Net::HTTP does not wait to send request body with Expect: 100-continue

9 messages 2010/07/28

[ruby-core:31410] [Bug #3596] Can Marshal nested Hash from 1.9.2 --> 1.8.7

From: Dreamcat Four <redmine@...>
Date: 2010-07-21 16:06:42 UTC
List: ruby-core #31410
Bug #3596: Can Marshal nested Hash from 1.9.2 --> 1.8.7
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3596

Author: Dreamcat Four
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2dev (2010-07-11 revision 28618) [i386-darwin10.4.0]

Hi,
The loaded Hash object has empty values where the inner hashes should be:

expected:
{"HashKeyA"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyB"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyC"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyD"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyE"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyF"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyG"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyH"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyI"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyJ"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyK"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyL"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyM"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyN"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyO"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyP"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyQ"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyR"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyS"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyT"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyU"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyV"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyW"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyX"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyY"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}, "HashKeyZ"=>{"StringA"=>"a"}}

got:
{"HashKeyA"=>{}, "HashKeyB"=>{}, "HashKeyC"=>{}, "HashKeyD"=>{}, "HashKeyE"=>{}, "HashKeyF"=>{}, "HashKeyG"=>{}, "HashKeyH"=>{}, "HashKeyI"=>{}, "HashKeyJ"=>{}, "HashKeyK"=>{}, "HashKeyL"=>{}, "HashKeyM"=>{}, "HashKeyN"=>{}, "HashKeyO"=>{}, "HashKeyP"=>{}, "HashKeyQ"=>{}, "HashKeyR"=>{}, "HashKeyS"=>{}, "HashKeyT"=>{}, "HashKeyU"=>{}, "HashKeyV"=>{}, "HashKeyW"=>{}, "HashKeyX"=>{}, "HashKeyY"=>{}, "HashKeyZ"=>{}}

The 1.8.7 can reads the keys... but only for the 1st level of the hash. Heh, it *almost* works, just not quite fully there (but nearly!).

I am guessing this aught to be regarded as a bug because the Marshal Version is 4,8 for both Ruby versions:

1.9.2
$ cat /opt/rvm/src/ruby-1.9.2-rc2/marshal.c | grep '#define MARSHAL_M'
#define MARSHAL_MAJOR   4
#define MARSHAL_MINOR   8

1.8.7
$ cat /opt/rvm/src/ruby-1.8.7-p174/marshal.c | grep '#define MARSHAL_M'
#define MARSHAL_MAJOR   4
#define MARSHAL_MINOR   8


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next