From: Lee Jarvis Date: 2010-07-21T16:37:52+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:31392] Re: [Feature #3591] Adding Numeric#divisor? (Have working implementation) --0015174c153242da1c048be0cc4f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 21 July 2010 08:22, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote: > Hi, > > At Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:28:35 +0900, > Nick Markwell wrote in [ruby-core:31385]: > > Example usage: > > 4.divisor?(2) #=> true > > 1.divisor?(2) #=> false > > 2.4.divisor?(1.2) #=> true > > 2.4.divisor?(1.3) #=> false > > 126.divisor?(9) #=> true > > I suspect if Float#divisor? makes a sense, and the name doesn't > feel appropriate very much. The first example seems `four is a > divisor of two?' What about `4.multiple?(2)'? > > -- > Nobu Nakada > > +1 for multiple? --0015174c153242da1c048be0cc4f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 21 July 2010 08:22, Nobuyoshi Nakada = <nobu@ruby-lang.= org> wrote:
Hi,

At Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:28:35 +0900,
Nick Markwell wrote in [ruby-core:31385]:
> Example usage:
> =A0 4.divisor?(2) =A0 =A0 #=3D> true
> =A0 1.divisor?(2) =A0 =A0 #=3D> false
> =A0 2.4.divisor?(1.2) #=3D> true
> =A0 2.4.divisor?(1.3) #=3D> false
> =A0 126.divisor?(9) =A0 #=3D> true

I suspect if Float#divisor? makes a sense, and the name doesn't feel appropriate very much. =A0The first example seems `four is a
divisor of two?' =A0What about `4.multiple?(2)'?

--
Nobu Nakada


+1 for multiple?
--0015174c153242da1c048be0cc4f--