[#144] Another implementation of Bignum — "Dmitry Antipov" <dmitry.antipov@...>
Hello Ruby hackers,
15 messages
2002/06/06
[#151] Re: Another implementation of Bignum [tarball attached]
— "Dmitry Antipov" <dmitry.antipov@...>
2002/06/07
Hello again,
[#152] Re: Another implementation of Bignum [tarball attached]
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2002/06/07
Hi,
[#174] Improving Ruby's garbage collector for interactive apps — Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...>
re: this problem I had a few weeks back:
8 messages
2002/06/19
[#177] Re: Improving Ruby's garbage collector for interactive apps
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2002/06/20
Hi,
[#178] Re: Improving Ruby's garbage collector for interactive apps
— Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...>
2002/06/21
On Thursday 20 June 2002 18:54, you wrote:
[#186] Steps to get multiple interpreters per process... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...>
Can someone chart out what would need to happen to get multiple ruby
10 messages
2002/06/24
[#187] Re: Steps to get multiple interpreters per process...
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2002/06/25
Hi,
[#188] Re: Steps to get multiple interpreters per process...
— Sean Chittenden <sean@...>
2002/06/25
> |Can someone chart out what would need to happen to get multiple
[#191] Re: Steps to get multiple interpreters per process...
— Chris Ross <chris@...>
2002/06/25
Re: rb_hash_has_key() and friends non-static...
From:
Chris Ross <chris@...>
Date:
2002-06-04 11:37:57 UTC
List:
ruby-core #124
On Tue, 04 Jun 2002 01:26:44 Sean Chittenden wrote: : > > As for splitting out the declarations into its own header, that was : > > just something I did as it would provide a very convenient way of : > > grouping and documenting the C API inline with the headers. Can : > > someone please comment on either? -sc : > : > The name "ruby_hash.h" doesn't seem so good, for me. : : How about just "hash.h" ? It does seem like overkill to have "ruby_" : in there. -sc How about file system name conflicts? -> with ruby_ you atleast can guarantee that when the header is found by the compiler it's the correct one. The other approach is to have them all in a ruby/ directory in the include directory. Regards, Chris -- +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Chris Ross | chris@darkrock.co.uk | ctr@ferite.org | | | http://www.darkrock.co.uk | http://www.ferite.org | +------------------------------------------------------------------+ "I feel more like I do now than I did before."