[#144] Another implementation of Bignum — "Dmitry Antipov" <dmitry.antipov@...>
Hello Ruby hackers,
15 messages
2002/06/06
[#151] Re: Another implementation of Bignum [tarball attached]
— "Dmitry Antipov" <dmitry.antipov@...>
2002/06/07
Hello again,
[#152] Re: Another implementation of Bignum [tarball attached]
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2002/06/07
Hi,
[#174] Improving Ruby's garbage collector for interactive apps — Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...>
re: this problem I had a few weeks back:
8 messages
2002/06/19
[#177] Re: Improving Ruby's garbage collector for interactive apps
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2002/06/20
Hi,
[#178] Re: Improving Ruby's garbage collector for interactive apps
— Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...>
2002/06/21
On Thursday 20 June 2002 18:54, you wrote:
[#186] Steps to get multiple interpreters per process... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...>
Can someone chart out what would need to happen to get multiple ruby
10 messages
2002/06/24
[#187] Re: Steps to get multiple interpreters per process...
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2002/06/25
Hi,
[#188] Re: Steps to get multiple interpreters per process...
— Sean Chittenden <sean@...>
2002/06/25
> |Can someone chart out what would need to happen to get multiple
[#191] Re: Steps to get multiple interpreters per process...
— Chris Ross <chris@...>
2002/06/25
Re: Improving Ruby's garbage collector for interactive apps
From:
Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
Date:
2002-06-21 05:24:05 UTC
List:
ruby-core #180
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > Long time ago, before I implemented Ruby's own GC, I tried to use > Boehm GC, but it dumped core immediately. The situation might have > changed in the last 9 years. My experience with Boehm GC was that it was (apparently) incompatible with gdb. It always sent segfaulted right away in GC_find_limit. I thought it was something funky about the app I was debugging, but maybe not. Your comment sent me to google on 'gdb GC_find_limit' and it seems that this behavior is normal, and not fatal: http://mi.med.tohoku.ac.jp/~satodai/w3m-dev-en/200108.month/578.html http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/guile-user/2000-October/000362.html