[#144] Another implementation of Bignum — "Dmitry Antipov" <dmitry.antipov@...>
Hello Ruby hackers,
15 messages
2002/06/06
[#151] Re: Another implementation of Bignum [tarball attached]
— "Dmitry Antipov" <dmitry.antipov@...>
2002/06/07
Hello again,
[#152] Re: Another implementation of Bignum [tarball attached]
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2002/06/07
Hi,
[#174] Improving Ruby's garbage collector for interactive apps — Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...>
re: this problem I had a few weeks back:
8 messages
2002/06/19
[#177] Re: Improving Ruby's garbage collector for interactive apps
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2002/06/20
Hi,
[#178] Re: Improving Ruby's garbage collector for interactive apps
— Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...>
2002/06/21
On Thursday 20 June 2002 18:54, you wrote:
[#186] Steps to get multiple interpreters per process... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...>
Can someone chart out what would need to happen to get multiple ruby
10 messages
2002/06/24
[#187] Re: Steps to get multiple interpreters per process...
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2002/06/25
Hi,
[#188] Re: Steps to get multiple interpreters per process...
— Sean Chittenden <sean@...>
2002/06/25
> |Can someone chart out what would need to happen to get multiple
[#191] Re: Steps to get multiple interpreters per process...
— Chris Ross <chris@...>
2002/06/25
Re: Another implementation of Bignum
From:
ts <decoux@...>
Date:
2002-06-06 09:02:44 UTC
List:
ruby-core #145
>>>>> "D" == Dmitry Antipov <dmitry.antipov@mail.ru> writes: D> I'm working on a new implementation of Bignum, which is based on D> GNU GMP library (see http://www.swox.com/gmp). GMP implements D> very efficient computations with arbitray-sized numbers (much faster D> than Ruby does, especially for large numbers). My code is in alpha stage D> for now (no crashes, but some results are spurious). New implementation D> may be selected with `configure' switch, otherwise current (default) D> implementation will be used. The ready-to-try patch against version D> 1.6.7 already exists. Anybody interesting in ? I've not understood : the core of ruby is modified ? If yes, do this mean that the new version will have the same problem than the old version with the GNU license ? Guy Decoux