From: nobu.nokada@...
Date: 2002-06-04T19:25:30+09:00
Subject: Re: rb_hash_has_key() and friends non-static...

Hi,

At Tue, 4 Jun 2002 09:26:44 +0900,
Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > As for splitting out the declarations into its own header, that was
> > > just something I did as it would provide a very convenient way of
> > > grouping and documenting the C API inline with the headers.  Can
> > > someone please comment on either?  -sc
> > 
> > The name "ruby_hash.h" doesn't seem so good, for me.
> 
> How about just "hash.h" ?  It does seem like overkill to have "ruby_"
> in there.  -sc

How about other data structures, all headers like "array.h",
"string.h" and so on?  What's the reason they should be
splitted from "intern.h"?

-- 
Nobu Nakada