[#116016] [Ruby master Bug#20150] Memory leak in grapheme clusters — "peterzhu2118 (Peter Zhu) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Issue #20150 has been reported by peterzhu2118 (Peter Zhu).
7 messages
2024/01/04
[#116382] [Ruby master Feature#20205] Enable `frozen_string_literal` by default — "byroot (Jean Boussier) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Issue #20205 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).
77 messages
2024/01/23
[ruby-core:116404] [Ruby master Feature#20205] Enable `frozen_string_literal` by default
From:
duerst via ruby-core <ruby-core@...>
Date:
2024-01-24 11:11:27 UTC
List:
ruby-core #116404
Issue #20205 has been updated by duerst (Martin D=FCrst). `frozen_string_literal` can lead to more efficient code, but it's also part= of a programming style (usually called functional programming). Functional= programming often leads to cleaner code, but it may require some additiona= l programming effort. There's also a fundamental conflict between object-or= iented programming (objects are generally mutable) and functional programmi= ng, although Ruby is pretty good at integrating these concepts. My main issue with this proposal is that I think it's probably the right th= ing for most big code bases, but it may not be the right thing for quick-an= d-dirty small scripts. And Ruby is used, and should continue to be usable, = for both kinds of code. Maybe what could help is a declaration on a higher level, e.g. per gem or s= o rather than per source file. (That's just an idea, with many open questio= ns: Where would the setting go? How would the interpreter pick it up? How w= ould people become aware of it? ...) ---------------------------------------- Feature #20205: Enable `frozen_string_literal` by default https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20205#change-106425 * Author: byroot (Jean Boussier) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- ### Context The `frozen_string_literal: true` pragma was introduced in Ruby 2.3, and as= far as I'm aware the plan was initially to make it the default for Ruby 3.= 0, but this plan was abandoned because it would be too much of a breaking c= hange without any real further notice. According to Matz, he still wishes to enable `frozen_string_literal` by def= ault in the future, but a reasonable migration plan is required.=20 The main issue is backward compatibility, flipping the switch immediately w= ould break a lot of code, so there must be some deprecation period. The usual the path forward for this kind of change is to emit deprecation w= arnings one of multiple versions in advance. One example of that was the Ruby 2.7 keyword argument deprecation. It was q= uite verbose, and some users were initially annoyed, but I think the commun= ity pulled through it and I don't seem to hear much about it anymore. So for frozen string literals, the first step would be to start warning whe= n a string that would be frozen in the future is mutated. ### Deprecation Warning Implementation I implemented a quick proof of concept with @etienne in https://github.com/= Shopify/ruby/pull/549 In short: - Files with `# frozen_string_literal: true` or `# frozen_string_literal: f= alse` don't change in behavior at all. - Files with no `# frozen_string_literal` comment are compiled to use `putc= hilledstring` opcode instead of regular `putstring`. - This opcode mark the string with a user flag, when these strings are muta= ted, a warning is issued. Currently the proof of concept issue the warning at the mutation location, = which in some case can make locating where the string was allocated a bit h= ard. But it is possible to improve it so the message also include the location a= t which the literal string was allocated, and learning from the keyword arg= ument warning experience, we can record which warnings were already issued to avoid spamming users wi= th duplicated warnings. As currently implemented, there is almost no overhead. If we modify the imp= lementation to record the literal location, we'd incur a small memory overhead for each literal string in a file withou= t an explicit `frozen_string_literal` pragma. But I believe we could do it in a way that has no overhead if `Warning[:dep= recated] =3D false`. ### Timeline The migration would happen in 3 steps, each step can potentially last multi= ple releases. e.g. `R0` could be `3.4`, `R1` be `3.7` and `R2` be `4.0`. I don't have a strong opinion on the pace. - Release `R0`: introduce the deprecation warning (only if deprecation warn= ings enabled). - Release `R1`: make the deprecation warning show up regardless of verbosit= y level. - Release `R2`: make string literals frozen by default. ### Impact Given that `rubocop` is quite popular in the community and it has enforced = the usage of `# frozen_string_literal: true` for years now, I suspect a large part of the actively maintained codebases in the wild wou= ldn't see any warnings. And with recent versions of `minitest` enabling deprecation warnings by def= ault (and [potentially RSpec too](https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/issue= s/2867)), the few that didn't migrate will likely be made compatible quickly. The real problem of course are the less actively developed libraries and ap= plications. For such cases, any codebase can remain compatible by setting `= RUBYOPT=3D"--disable=3Dfrozen_string_literal"`, and so even after `R2` release. The flag would never be removed any legacy = codebase can continue upgrading Ruby without changing a single line of cod = by just flipping this flag. ### Workflow for library maintainers As a library maintainer, fixing the deprecation warnings can be as simple a= s prepending `# frozen_string_literal: false` at the top of all their sourc= e files, and this will keep working forever. Alternatively they can of course make their code compatible with frozen str= ing literals. Code that is frozen string literal compatible doesn't need to explicitly de= clare it. Only code that need it turned of need to do so. ### Workflow for application owners For application owners, the workflow is the same than for libraries. However if they depend on a gem that hasn't updated, or that they can't upg= rade it, they can run their application with `RUBYOPT=3D"--disable=3Dfrozen= _string_literal"` and it will keep working forever. Any user running into an incompatibility issue can set `RUBYOPT=3D"--disabl= e=3Dfrozen_string_literal"` forever, even in `4.x`, the only thing changing= is the default value. And any application for which all dependencies have been made fully frozen = string literal compatible can set `RUBYOPT=3D"--enable=3Dfrozen_string_lite= ral"` and start immediately removing magic comment from their codebase. --=20 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ ______________________________________________ ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-c= ore.ml.ruby-lang.org/