[#113756] [Ruby master Bug#19711] NoMethodError "private method `new' called for class" since bebd05fb51ea65bc57344b67100748200f8311eb — "yahonda (Yasuo Honda) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19711 has been reported by yahonda (Yasuo Honda).

7 messages 2023/06/05

[#113771] [Ruby master Feature#19712] IO#reopen removes singleton class — "itarato (Peter Arato) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19712 has been reported by itarato (Peter Arato).

11 messages 2023/06/05

[#113782] [Ruby master Bug#19716] SystemStackError occurs too easily on Alpine Linux (due to small stack size reported by pthread_attr_getstacksize on musl libc) — "alexdowad (Alex Dowad) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19716 has been reported by alexdowad (Alex Dowad).

6 messages 2023/06/07

[#113788] [Ruby master Bug#19717] `ConditionVariable#signal` is not fair when the wakeup is consistently spurious. — "ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19717 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

13 messages 2023/06/07

[#113819] [Ruby master Feature#19720] Warning for non-linear Regexps — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19720 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

11 messages 2023/06/08

[#113835] [Ruby master Misc#19722] DevMeeting-2023-07-13 — "mame (Yusuke Endoh) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19722 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

9 messages 2023/06/09

[#113944] [Ruby master Feature#19737] Add `IO::Buffer#cat` for concat `IO::Buffer` instances — "unasuke (Yusuke Nakamura) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19737 has been reported by unasuke (Yusuke Nakamura).

7 messages 2023/06/19

[#113953] [Ruby master Bug#19739] Key cannot be found in a Hash when slice! method is applied to the key — "ilya.andreyuk (Ilya Andreyuk) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19739 has been reported by ilya.andreyuk (Ilya Andreyuk).

9 messages 2023/06/20

[#113966] [Ruby master Bug#19742] Introduce `Module#anonymous?` — "ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19742 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

47 messages 2023/06/21

[#114025] [Ruby master Feature#19744] Namespace on read — "tagomoris (Satoshi TAGOMORI) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19744 has been reported by tagomoris (Satoshi TAGOMORI).

71 messages 2023/06/27

[#114032] [Ruby master Misc#19747] Propose Kevin Newton and Jemma Issroff as core committers — "k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19747 has been reported by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).

8 messages 2023/06/28

[#114038] [Ruby master Bug#19749] Confirm correct behaviour when attaching private method with `#define_method` — "itarato (Peter Arato) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #19749 has been reported by itarato (Peter Arato).

15 messages 2023/06/28

[ruby-core:113940] [Ruby master Feature#19521] Support for `Module#name=` and `Class#name=`.

From: "Eregon (Benoit Daloze) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Date: 2023-06-19 13:16:32 UTC
List: ruby-core #113940
Issue #19521 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).


ioquatix (Samuel Williams) wrote in #note-25:
> @Eregon I understand your point, but why would anyone do that? Isn't that kind of shooting yourself in the foot?

Well, even the docs and specs you added in that PR do that, it's inviting people to do it without telling them the big problem or protecting against it.

> And in any case, your example is already trivially possible without this PR/change:

Nope, that is fine (besides of course the bad idea to override a core constant, but at least you get a warning for that),
because the class of that object can in fact be referenced by `String` or at least it has been related to the constant path `String` at some point.

`Class.new.tap { _1.set_temporary_name "Foo" }` has never been related to the constant `Foo`. It's a lie.

And if you look at usages of `labeled_module`/`labeled_class` e.g. with `git grep labeled_ test` you can see for almost all of them it would be confusing to use `set_temporary_name`.
First they should use a non-valid constant name to make it clear e.g., what is currently labeled as `klass = EnvUtil.labeled_class("Parent")` cannot be accessed through `Parent` (otherwise good luck to write tests or any Ruby if you regularly cannot trust the output of a NoMethodError due to this new feature/bug).

----------------------------------------
Feature #19521: Support for `Module#name=` and `Class#name=`.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19521#change-103594

* Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
See https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19450 for previous discussion and motivation.

[This proposal](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/7483) introduces `Module#name=` (and thus also `Class#name=`) to set the temporary class name. The name assignment has no effect if the module/class already has a permanent name.

```ruby
c = Class.new do
  self.name = "fake name"
end

c = Class.new
c.name = "fake name"
```

Alternatively, we could use `set_name`:

```ruby
Class.new do
  set_name "fake_name"
end
```

Setting the name of a class changes its current name, irrespective of whether it's been assigned a permanent name, or has nested modules/classes which have cached a previous name. We might like to limit the cases where a name is set, e.g. only once, only if the name is nil, or only if it's not already permanent. There is no real harm in any of those options, just inconsistency.

## Example usage

The current Ruby test suite has code which shows the usefulness of this new method:

```ruby
  def labeled_module(name, &block)
    Module.new do
      singleton_class.class_eval {
        define_method(:to_s) {name}
        alias inspect to_s
        alias name to_s
      }
      class_eval(&block) if block
    end
  end
  module_function :labeled_module

  def labeled_class(name, superclass = Object, &block)
    Class.new(superclass) do
      singleton_class.class_eval {
        define_method(:to_s) {name}
        alias inspect to_s
        alias name to_s
      }
      class_eval(&block) if block
    end
  end
  module_function :labeled_class
```

The updated code would look like this:

```ruby
  def labeled_module(name, &block)
    Module.new do
      self.name = name
      class_eval(&block) if block
    end
  end

  def labeled_class(name, superclass = Object, &block)
    Class.new(superclass) do
      self.name = name
      class_eval(&block) if block
    end
  end
  module_function :labeled_class
```

Because the name cannot be set as part of `.new`, we have to have a separate block to set the name, before calling `class_eval`. I think the ergonomics and performance of this are slightly worse than the [counter proposal](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19520).



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
 ______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread