From: "zverok (Victor Shepelev)" Date: 2021-12-03T14:23:50+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:106462] [Ruby master Feature#18369] users.detect(:name, "Dorian") as shorthand for users.detect { |user| user.name == "Dorian" } Issue #18369 has been updated by zverok (Victor Shepelev). > Close enough? Obviously :) But still a "hack". E.g. it is not a "value representing the pattern", this way we can talk ourselves into "we didn't need PM at all, we always could ```ruby MY_PATTERN = -> { _1[:name] =~ /^B && _1[:age] > 18 } # ...and case foo when -> { _1[:name] =~ /^B && _1[:age] > 18 } ``` :shrug: ---------------------------------------- Feature #18369: users.detect(:name, "Dorian") as shorthand for users.detect { |user| user.name == "Dorian" } https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18369#change-95119 * Author: dorianmariefr (Dorian Mari��) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- Hi, I was thinking I often do things like `collection.detect { |item| item.attribute == value }` and a shorthand like `collection.detect(:attribute, value)` would be quite useful What do you think? And I know there is `collection.detect { _1.attribute == value }` but I try not to use `_1` and this syntax would be shorter and simpler Could also apply to other methods like `all?` (`collection.all?(:attribute, value)`), and basically any Enumerable method https://rubydoc.info/stdlib/core/Enumerable -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: