[#109844] [Ruby master Feature#18996] Proposal: Introduce new APIs to reline for changing dialog UI colours — "st0012 (Stan Lo)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18996 has been reported by st0012 (Stan Lo).

14 messages 2022/09/07

[#109850] [Ruby master Feature#19000] Data: Add "Copy with changes method" [Follow-on to #16122 Data: simple immutable value object] — "RubyBugs (A Nonymous)" <noreply@...>

Issue #19000 has been reported by RubyBugs (A Nonymous).

42 messages 2022/09/08

[#109905] [Ruby master Bug#19005] Ruby interpreter compiled XCode 14 cannot build some native gems on macOS — "stanhu (Stan Hu)" <noreply@...>

Issue #19005 has been reported by stanhu (Stan Hu).

28 messages 2022/09/15

[#109930] [Ruby master Bug#19007] Unicode tables differences from Unicode.org 14.0 data and removed properties since 13.0 — "nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)" <noreply@...>

Issue #19007 has been reported by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada).

8 messages 2022/09/17

[#109937] [Ruby master Feature#19008] Introduce coverage support for `eval`. — "ioquatix (Samuel Williams)" <noreply@...>

Issue #19008 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

23 messages 2022/09/17

[#109961] [Ruby master Bug#19012] BasicSocket#recv* methods return an empty packet instead of nil on closed connections — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #19012 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

8 messages 2022/09/20

[#109985] [Ruby master Feature#19015] Language extension by a heredoc — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <noreply@...>

Issue #19015 has been reported by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).

14 messages 2022/09/22

[#109995] [Ruby master Bug#19016] syntax_suggest is not working with Ruby 3.2.0-preview2 — "hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA)" <noreply@...>

Issue #19016 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).

9 messages 2022/09/22

[#110097] [Ruby master Feature#19024] Proposal: Import Modules — "shioyama (Chris Salzberg)" <noreply@...>

SXNzdWUgIzE5MDI0IGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IHNoaW95YW1hIChDaHJpcyBTYWx6YmVy

27 messages 2022/09/27

[#110119] [Ruby master Bug#19026] Add `Coverage.supported?(x)` to detect support for `eval` coverage flag. — "ioquatix (Samuel Williams)" <noreply@...>

SXNzdWUgIzE5MDI2IGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IGlvcXVhdGl4IChTYW11ZWwgV2lsbGlh

10 messages 2022/09/28

[#110133] [Ruby master Bug#19028] GCC12 Introduces new warn flags `-Wuse-after-free` — "eightbitraptor (Matthew Valentine-House)" <noreply@...>

SXNzdWUgIzE5MDI4IGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IGVpZ2h0Yml0cmFwdG9yIChNYXR0aGV3

8 messages 2022/09/28

[#110145] [Ruby master Misc#19030] [ANN] Migrate lists.ruby-lang.org to Google Groups — "hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA)" <noreply@...>

SXNzdWUgIzE5MDMwIGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IGhzYnQgKEhpcm9zaGkgU0hJQkFUQSku

12 messages 2022/09/29

[#110154] [Ruby master Bug#19033] One-liner pattern match as Boolean arg syntax error — "baweaver (Brandon Weaver)" <noreply@...>

SXNzdWUgIzE5MDMzIGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IGJhd2VhdmVyIChCcmFuZG9uIFdlYXZl

7 messages 2022/09/30

[ruby-core:109827] [Ruby master Bug#18435] Calling `protected` on ancestor method changes result of `instance_methods(false)`

From: "nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga)" <noreply@...>
Date: 2022-09-03 06:06:34 UTC
List: ruby-core #109827
Issue #18435 has been updated by nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga).

Backport changed from 2.6: DONTNEED, 2.7: DONTNEED, 3.0: DONTNEED, 3.1: REQUIRED to 2.6: DONTNEED, 2.7: DONTNEED, 3.0: DONTNEED, 3.1: DONE

ruby_3_1 5473c1064d5e82d706b554f2fe5a5b41900f6b14 merged revision(s) 8212aab81a77a2a91fb7c1681b4968171193b48f,209631a45f9682dedf718f4b4a140efe7d21a6fc.

----------------------------------------
Bug #18435: Calling `protected` on ancestor method changes result of `instance_methods(false)`
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18435#change-99065

* Author: ufuk (Ufuk Kayserilioglu)
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Eregon (Benoit Daloze)
* ruby -v: ruby 2.7.5p203 (2021-11-24 revision f69aeb8314) [x86_64-darwin20]
* Backport: 2.6: DONTNEED, 2.7: DONTNEED, 3.0: DONTNEED, 3.1: DONE
----------------------------------------
As documented `instance_methods(false)` works as follows:

```ruby
module A
  def method1()  end
end

class B
  include A

  def method2()  end
end

p B.instance_methods(false) #=> [:method2]
```

However, calling `protected` on the method defined by `A`, unexpectedly changes the result of `instance_methods(false)` on `B`, even though the owner of the method is still `A`:
```ruby
module A
  def method1()  end
end

class B
  include A

  protected :method1

  def method2()  end
end

p B.instance_methods(false) #=> [:method1, :method2]
p B.instance_method(:method1).owner #=> A
```

In contrast, calling `private` or `public` on the same method does not cause any changes on the result of `B.instance_methods(false)`.

This feels like a bug in the implementation of `instance_methods(false)`, but, if it is by design, it should at least be documented on `Module#instance_methods`.

This reproduction script gives the same output all the way from Ruby 2.0 up to Ruby-HEAD:
https://wandbox.org/permlink/LqbXMBTYxURRZmDz



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread