From: "sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)" Date: 2021-12-02T16:16:04+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:106398] [Ruby master Feature#18369] users.detect(:name, "Dorian") as shorthand for users.detect { |user| user.name == "Dorian" } Issue #18369 has been updated by sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada). cvss (Kirill Vechera) wrote in #note-8: > It's a good occasion to use the composition of Proc/Method objects: > > ``` ruby > collection.detect(&:first_name.to_proc>>"Dorian".method(:==)) > ``` Your trick forces the use of Yoda conditions, which may be tricky and cryptic. ---------------------------------------- Feature #18369: users.detect(:name, "Dorian") as shorthand for users.detect { |user| user.name == "Dorian" } https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18369#change-95036 * Author: dorianmariefr (Dorian Mari��) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- Hi, I was thinking I often do things like `collection.detect { |item| item.attribute == value }` and a shorthand like `collection.detect(:attribute, value)` would be quite useful What do you think? And I know there is `collection.detect { _1.attribute == value }` but I try not to use `_1` and this syntax would be shorter and simpler Could also apply to other methods like `all?` (`collection.all?(:attribute, value)`), and basically any Enumerable method https://rubydoc.info/stdlib/core/Enumerable -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: