From: lyoneil.de.sire@... Date: 2018-10-30T00:47:09+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:89623] [Ruby trunk Feature#15236] add support for hash shorthand Issue #15236 has been updated by ignatiusreza (Ignatius Reza Lesmana). janfri (Jan Friedrich) wrote: > I think the use of destructuring for this is much more Rubyish than the ES6 syntax. Agreed that destructuring hash is very much ruby, since destructuring array is already supported.. but, I think supporting that does not mean that we can't support this one too.. in fact, I think supporting both would be best, since I would expect that if I can do one, I should also be able to do the other.. ---------------------------------------- Feature #15236: add support for hash shorthand https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15236#change-74661 * Author: ignatiusreza (Ignatius Reza Lesmana) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: ---------------------------------------- PR in github: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/1990 inspired by javascript support for object literal shorthand notation `{ a }`, which will be expanded into `{ a: a }`.. to avoid ambiguity, this shorthand is only supported when hash is defined with `{ }` notation.. in other situation where the brackets is optional, e.g. function call, we still need to write it in full (`m(a : a)` instead of `m(a)`, or `m(a, b, c: c)` instead of `m(a, b, c)`.. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: