From: nobu@... Date: 2017-03-28T05:44:59+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:80421] [Ruby trunk Bug#13358] OpenStruct overriding allocate Issue #13358 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada). Eregon (Benoit Daloze) wrote: > But my main issue with this fix is it only addresses a specific use-case and not the general issue: > `#respond_to?` should work on any object, even uninitialized and just `#allocate`-d. > `Kernel#respond_to_missing?` works on any object, but `OpenStruct#respond_to_missing?` does not currently. I can't get your point. `OpenStruct#respond_to?` works as others, and `OpenStruct#respond_to_missing?` too. Anyway `Kernel#respond_to_missing?` is private and not to be used directly. > For instance, `Class.instance_method(:allocate).bind(OpenStruct).call.respond_to?(:foo)` breaks. Why bypass overridden methods? > I will commit my patch tomorrow unless you object. I object. > It is more robust and has no significant downside. No merit. ---------------------------------------- Bug #13358: OpenStruct overriding allocate https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13358#change-63914 * Author: sitter (Harald Sitter) * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.4.0p0 (2016-12-24 revision 57164) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 2.2: DONTNEED, 2.3: DONE, 2.4: DONTNEED ---------------------------------------- In https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/15960b37e82ba60455c480b1c23e1567255d3e05 OpenStruct gained ~~~ruby class << self # :nodoc: alias allocate new end ~~~ Which is rather severely conflicting with expected behavior as `Class.allocate` is meant to [not call initialize](http://ruby-doc.org/core-2.4.0/Class.html#method-i-allocate). So, in fact, the change made `allocate` of `OpenStruct` do what `allocate` is asserting not to do :-/ For `OpenStruct` itself that isn't that big a deal, for classes inheriting from `OpenStruct` it breaks `allocate` though. Example: ~~~ruby require 'ostruct' class A < OpenStruct def initialize(x, y = {}) super(y) end end A.allocate ~~~ As `allocate` is alias'd to `new` in `OpenStruct` this will attempt to initialize `A` which will raise an `ArgumentError` because `A` cannot be initialized without arguments. ~~~ $ ruby x.rb x.rb:4:in `initialize': wrong number of arguments (given 0, expected 1..2) (ArgumentError) from x.rb:9:in `new' from x.rb:9:in `
' ~~~ OpenStruct at the very least should document the fact that its allocate is behaving differently. Ideally, `OpenStruct` should not alias allocate at all. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: